Suppr超能文献

心理物理学对比度校准。

Psychophysical contrast calibration.

作者信息

To Long, Woods Russell L, Goldstein Robert B, Peli Eli

机构信息

Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

Abstract

Electronic displays and computer systems offer numerous advantages for clinical vision testing. Laboratory and clinical measurements of various functions and in particular of (letter) contrast sensitivity require accurately calibrated display contrast. In the laboratory this is achieved using expensive light meters. We developed and evaluated a novel method that uses only psychophysical responses of a person with normal vision to calibrate the luminance contrast of displays for experimental and clinical applications. Our method combines psychophysical techniques (1) for detection (and thus elimination or reduction) of display saturating non-linearities; (2) for luminance (gamma function) estimation and linearization without use of a photometer; and (3) to measure without a photometer the luminance ratios of the display's three color channels that are used in a bit-stealing procedure to expand the luminance resolution of the display. Using a photometer we verified that the calibration achieved with this procedure is accurate for both LCD and CRT displays enabling testing of letter contrast sensitivity to 0.5%. Our visual calibration procedure enables clinical, internet and home implementation and calibration verification of electronic contrast testing.

摘要

电子显示器和计算机系统为临床视力测试提供了诸多优势。对各种功能,尤其是(字母)对比度敏感度进行实验室和临床测量时,需要精确校准显示器对比度。在实验室中,这要通过使用昂贵的光度计来实现。我们开发并评估了一种新颖的方法,该方法仅利用视力正常者的心理物理反应来校准显示器的亮度对比度,以用于实验和临床应用。我们的方法结合了心理物理技术:(1)用于检测(从而消除或减少)显示器饱和非线性;(2)用于在不使用光度计的情况下估计亮度(伽马函数)并进行线性化;(3)在不使用光度计的情况下测量显示器三个颜色通道的亮度比,该亮度比用于一种窃取位的程序中以扩展显示器的亮度分辨率。我们使用光度计验证了通过此程序实现的校准对于液晶显示器(LCD)和阴极射线管显示器(CRT)均准确无误,能够将字母对比度敏感度测试至0.5%。我们的视觉校准程序能够实现临床、互联网及家庭环境下电子对比度测试的实施与校准验证。

相似文献

1
Psychophysical contrast calibration.
Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
4
Calibrated LCD/TFT stimulus presentation for visual psychophysics in fMRI.
J Neurosci Methods. 2002 Nov 15;121(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00246-7.
5
Luminance affects age-related deficits in object detection: implications for computerized psychological assessments.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):522-528. doi: 10.1037/a0025576. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
6
Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast.
J Opt Soc Am A. 1990 Oct;7(10):2002-10. doi: 10.1364/josaa.7.002002.
7
The pointillism method for creating stimuli suitable for use in computer-based visual contrast sensitivity testing.
J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Mar 30;142(2):219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.08.017.
8
Inter-Display Reproducibility of Contrast Sensitivity Measurement with iPad.
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Dec;93(12):1532-1536. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000972.
10
Calibration tools for PC-based vision assessment.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:781-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333596.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring uncertainty in human visual segmentation.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Sep 25;19(9):e1011483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011483. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Eriksen flanker delta plot shapes depend on the stimulus.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):685-699. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02166-0. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Crowdsourcing visual perception experiments: a case of contrast threshold.
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 20;7:e8339. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8339. eCollection 2019.
5
Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 12;12:2597-2606. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S187832. eCollection 2018.
6
Positive and negative polarity contrast sensitivity measuring app.
IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging. 2016;2016. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-122. Epub 2016 Feb 14.
7
How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1473-1484. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0609-0. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
Detecting Visual Function Abnormality with a Contrast-Dependent Visual Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0162383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162383. eCollection 2016.
9
Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 23;3:e1058. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1058. eCollection 2015.
10
The effect of central vision loss on perception of mutual gaze.
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Aug;91(8):1000-11. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000314.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 5;54(12):7266-73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11743.
2
Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video.
J Soc Inf Disp. 2012 Nov 1;20(11):616-623. doi: 10.1002/jsid.127. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
3
Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.
J Vis. 2011 Aug 8;11(9):10.1167/11.9.2 2. doi: 10.1167/11.9.2.
4
Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):829-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0080-8.
6
Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve.
Vision Res. 2010 Jul 9;50(15):1452-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.013. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
7
Luminance contrast with clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Jul;33(7):1248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.024.
8
Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;91(6):749-52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.109280. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
9
Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability.
Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(1):126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
10
An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):970-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.ea.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验