• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing whole slide digital images versus traditional glass slides in the detection of common microscopic features seen in dermatitis.比较全玻片数字图像与传统玻璃玻片在检测皮炎中常见微观特征方面的差异。
J Pathol Inform. 2016 Jul 26;7:30. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.186909. eCollection 2016.
2
Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation.用于细胞病理学筛查和判读的玻片与各种数字玻片模式的比较。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Sep;125(9):701-709. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21880. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Comparing Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori Identification Using Traditional Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Glass Slides With Digital Whole Slide Imaging.比较传统苏木精-伊红染色玻片与数字全玻片成像在幽门螺杆菌鉴定中的准确性。
Lab Invest. 2024 Jan;104(1):100262. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100262. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images.利用全切片数字图像进行临床检查和验证解剖病理学的初步诊断。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Mar;135(3):372-8. doi: 10.5858/2009-0678-OA.1.
5
Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.数字时代的乳腺癌预后因素:使用全切片图像和玻璃切片对诺丁汉分级的比较
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Apr 3;10:11. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_29_18. eCollection 2019.
6
Validation of Digital Pathology for Primary Histopathological Diagnosis of Routine, Inflammatory Dermatopathology Cases.数字病理学在常规炎症性皮肤病理学病例原发性组织病理学诊断中的验证
Am J Dermatopathol. 2018 Jan;40(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000888.
7
iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.iPathology 座舱诊断工作站:根据美国病理学家学会病理与实验室质量中心的建议,在维罗纳医院信托和大学进行验证。
Diagn Pathol. 2014;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S12. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Diagnostic digital cytopathology: Are we ready yet?诊断性数字细胞病理学:我们准备好了吗?
J Pathol Inform. 2013 Oct 29;4:28. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.120727. eCollection 2013.
9
Diagnosis of dysplasia in upper gastro-intestinal tract biopsies through digital microscopy.通过数字显微镜诊断上消化道活检中的发育异常。
J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:27. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.100149. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
10
Validation of Remote Digital Frozen Sections for Cancer and Transplant Intraoperative Services.癌症及移植术中服务的远程数字冰冻切片验证
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Oct 9;9:34. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_52_18. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Dermatology residents' perspectives on virtual dermatopathology education.皮肤科住院医师对虚拟皮肤病理教学的看法。
J Cutan Pathol. 2024 Jul;51(7):530-537. doi: 10.1111/cup.14618. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
National resident survey in dermatopathology: The role of slide scanners in resident learning.全国皮肤科住院医师调查:幻灯片扫描仪在住院医师学习中的作用。
J Cutan Pathol. 2023 Dec;50(12):1078-1082. doi: 10.1111/cup.14538. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
3
Validation of digital microscopy: Review of validation methods and sources of bias.数字显微镜验证:验证方法和偏差来源综述。
Vet Pathol. 2022 Jan;59(1):26-38. doi: 10.1177/03009858211040476. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
The utility of digital pathology in improving the diagnostic skills of pathology trainees in commonly encountered pigmented cutaneous lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A single academic institution experience.数字病理学在 COVID-19 大流行期间提高病理实习生对常见色素性皮肤病变诊断技能的效用:单所学术机构的经验。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021 Oct;54:151807. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151807. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
Evaluating the success of the tele-pathology system in governmental hospitals in Kuwait: an explanatory sequential mixed methods design.评估科威特政府医院远程病理学系统的成功:解释性顺序混合方法设计。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01567-x.
6
Selection of Representative Histologic Slides in Interobserver Reproducibility Studies: Insights from Expert Review for Ovarian Carcinoma Subtype Classification.观察者间可重复性研究中代表性组织学切片的选择:卵巢癌亚型分类专家评审的见解
J Pathol Inform. 2021 Mar 22;12:15. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_56_20. eCollection 2021.
7
Head-tracking as an interface device for image control in digital pathology: a comparative study.头控作为数字病理学中图像控制的接口设备:一项对比研究。
Rev Esp Patol. 2020 Oct-Dec;53(4):213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions.数字病理分析与传统显微镜检查在解读黑素细胞病变中的准确性比较。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1159-1166. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2388.

本文引用的文献

1
Obstacles hindering the mainstream practice of teledermatopathology.阻碍远程皮肤病理学主流实践的障碍。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):772-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.04.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Dental students' perceptions of the use of digital microscopy as part of an oral pathology curriculum.口腔医学生对将数码显微镜应用于口腔病理学课程的看法。
J Dent Educ. 2013 Dec;77(12):1624-8.
3
The application of virtual microscopy in a dermatopathology educational setting: assessment of attitudes among dermatopathologists.虚拟显微镜在皮肤病理学教育环境中的应用:皮肤病理学家态度评估
Int J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;53(2):224-7. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12233. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Relationship between magnification and resolution in digital pathology systems.数字病理系统中放大倍数与分辨率之间的关系。
J Pathol Inform. 2013 Aug 22;4:21. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.116866.
5
Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of circumscribed sebaceous neoplasms of the skin.皮肤局限性皮脂性肿瘤诊断的观察者间变异性。
Pathology. 2013 Oct;45(6):581-6. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e328365618f.
6
Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents during a simulated in-training examination.在一次模拟在职培训考试中皮肤科住院医师对虚拟显微镜和玻片显微镜的比较。
J Cutan Pathol. 2013 Sep;40(9):807-11. doi: 10.1111/cup.12189. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
7
Smart teledermatopathology: a feasibility study of novel, high-value, portable, widely accessible and intuitive telepathology methods using handheld electronic devices.智能远程皮肤病理学:一项使用手持电子设备的新型、高价值、便携式、广泛可用且直观的远程病理学方法的可行性研究。
J Cutan Pathol. 2013 May;40(5):513-8. doi: 10.1111/cup.12108. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
8
Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.皮肤科病理学诊断中的差异:二次审核政策和皮肤科病理住院医师培训的作用。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
9
Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images.利用全切片数字图像进行临床检查和验证解剖病理学的初步诊断。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Mar;135(3):372-8. doi: 10.5858/2009-0678-OA.1.
10
Comparative diagnostic accuracy in virtual dermatopathology.虚拟皮肤病理学中的比较诊断准确性。
Skin Res Technol. 2011 May;17(2):251-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00493.x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

比较全玻片数字图像与传统玻璃玻片在检测皮炎中常见微观特征方面的差异。

Comparing whole slide digital images versus traditional glass slides in the detection of common microscopic features seen in dermatitis.

作者信息

Vyas Nikki S, Markow Michael, Prieto-Granada Carlos, Gaudi Sudeep, Turner Leslie, Rodriguez-Waitkus Paul, Messina Jane L, Jukic Drazen M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.

出版信息

J Pathol Inform. 2016 Jul 26;7:30. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.186909. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.4103/2153-3539.186909
PMID:27563489
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4977977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality and limitations of digital slides are not fully known. We aimed to estimate intrapathologist discrepancy in detecting specific microscopic features on glass slides and digital slides created by scanning at ×20.

METHODS

Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff glass slides were digitized using the Mirax Scan (Carl Zeiss Inc., Germany). Six pathologists assessed 50-71 digital slides. We recorded objective magnification, total time, and detection of the following: Mast cells; eosinophils; plasma cells; pigmented macrophages; melanin in the epidermis; fungal bodies; neutrophils; civatte bodies; parakeratosis; and sebocytes. This process was repeated using the corresponding glass slides after 3 weeks. The diagnosis was not required.

RESULTS

The mean time to assess digital slides was 176.77 s and 137.61 s for glass slides (P < 0.001, 99% confidence interval [CI]). The mean objective magnification used to detect features using digital slides was 18.28 and 14.07 for glass slides (P < 0.001, 99.99% CI). Parakeratosis, civatte bodies, pigmented macrophages, melanin in the epidermis, mast cells, eosinophils, plasma cells, and neutrophils, were identified at lower objectives on glass slides (P = 0.023-0.001, 95% CI). Average intraobserver concordance ranged from κ = 0.30 to κ = 0.78. Features with poor to fair average concordance were: Melanin in the epidermis (κ = 0.15-0.58); plasma cells (κ = 0.15-0.49); and neutrophils (κ = 0.12-0.48). Features with moderate average intrapathologist concordance were: parakeratosis (κ = 0.21-0.61); civatte bodies (κ = 0.21-0.71); pigment-laden macrophages (κ = 0.34-0.66); mast cells (κ = 0.29-0.78); and eosinophils (κ = 0.31-0.79). The average intrapathologist concordance was good for sebocytes (κ = 0.51-1.00) and fungal bodies (κ = 0.47-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Telepathology using digital slides scanned at ×20 is sufficient for detection of histopathologic features routinely encountered in dermatitis cases, though less efficient than glass slides.

摘要

背景

数字切片的质量和局限性尚未完全明确。我们旨在评估病理医生在检测玻璃切片以及通过×20扫描创建的数字切片上的特定微观特征时的内部差异。

方法

使用Mirax Scan(德国卡尔蔡司公司)将苏木精和伊红染色切片以及过碘酸-希夫染色切片数字化。六位病理医生评估了50 - 71张数字切片。我们记录了物镜放大倍数、总时间以及以下各项的检测情况:肥大细胞;嗜酸性粒细胞;浆细胞;色素沉着巨噬细胞;表皮中的黑色素;真菌体;中性粒细胞;基底层液化变性小体;角化不全;以及皮脂腺细胞。3周后,使用相应的玻璃切片重复此过程。不需要做出诊断。

结果

评估数字切片的平均时间为176.77秒,评估玻璃切片的平均时间为137.61秒(P < 0.001,99%置信区间[CI])。使用数字切片检测特征时的平均物镜放大倍数为18.28,使用玻璃切片时为14.07(P < 0.001,99.99% CI)。在玻璃切片上,角化不全、基底层液化变性小体、色素沉着巨噬细胞、表皮中的黑色素、肥大细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和浆细胞、中性粒细胞在较低物镜下被识别(P = 0.023 - 0.001,95% CI)。观察者内部平均一致性范围为κ = 0.30至κ = 0.78。平均一致性较差至中等的特征有:表皮中的黑色素(κ = 0.15 - 0.58);浆细胞(κ = 0.15 - 0.49);中性粒细胞(κ = 0.12 - 0.48)。病理医生内部平均一致性中等的特征有:角化不全(κ = 0.21 - 0.61);基底层液化变性小体(κ = 0.21 - 0.71);含色素巨噬细胞(κ = 0.34 - 0.66);肥大细胞(κ = 0.29 - 0.78);嗜酸性粒细胞(κ = 0.31 - 0.79)。病理医生内部对皮脂腺细胞(κ = 0.51 - 1.00)和真菌体(κ = 0.47 - 0.76)的平均一致性良好。

结论

使用×20扫描的数字切片进行远程病理学检查足以检测皮炎病例中常规遇到的组织病理学特征,尽管效率低于玻璃切片。