Hanna Matthew G, Monaco Sara E, Cuda Jacqueline, Xing Juan, Ahmed Ishtiaque, Pantanowitz Liron
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Sep;125(9):701-709. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21880. Epub 2017 May 30.
Whole-slide imaging in cytology is limited when glass slides are digitized without z-stacks for focusing. Different vendors have started to provide z-stacking solutions to overcome this limitation. The Panoptiq imaging system allows users to create digital files combining low-magnification panoramic images with regions of interest (ROIs) that are imaged with high-magnification z-stacks. The aim of this study was to compare such panoramic images with conventional whole-slide images and glass slides for the tasks of screening and interpretation in cytopathology.
Thirty glass slides, including 10 ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests and 20 nongynecologic cytology cases, were digitized with an Olympus BX45 integrated microscope with an attached Prosilica GT camera. ViewsIQ software was used for image acquisition and viewing. These glass slides were also scanned on an Aperio ScanScope XT at ×40 (0.25 μm/pixel) with 1 z-plane and were viewed with ImageScope software. Digital and glass sides were screened and dotted/annotated by a cytotechnologist and were subsequently reviewed by 3 cytopathologists. For panoramic images, the cytotechnologist manually created digital maps and selected representative ROIs to generate z-stacks at a higher magnification. After 3-week washout periods, panoramic images were compared with Aperio digital slides and glass slides.
The Panoptiq system permitted fine focusing of thick smears and cell clusters. In comparison with glass slides, the average screening times were 5.5 and 1.8 times longer with Panoptiq and Aperio images, respectively, but this improved with user experience. There was no statistical difference in diagnostic concordance between all 3 modalities. Users' diagnostic confidence was also similar for all modalities.
The Aperio whole-slide scanner with 1 z-plane scanning and the Panoptiq imaging system with z-stacking are both suitable for cytopathology screening and interpretation. However, ROI z-stacks do offer a superior mechanism for overcoming focusing problems commonly encountered with digital cytology slides. Unlike whole-slide imaging, the acquisition of representative z-stack images with the Panoptiq system requires a trained cytologist to create digital files. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:701-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
在细胞学中,当对载玻片进行数字化处理而不使用z轴堆叠进行聚焦时,全玻片成像受到限制。不同供应商已开始提供z轴堆叠解决方案以克服这一限制。Panoptiq成像系统允许用户创建数字文件,将低倍全景图像与通过高倍z轴堆叠成像的感兴趣区域(ROI)相结合。本研究的目的是比较此类全景图像与传统全玻片图像及载玻片在细胞病理学筛查和判读任务中的表现。
30张载玻片,包括10张ThinPrep巴氏染色涂片和20例非妇科细胞学病例,使用配备Prosilica GT相机的Olympus BX45一体化显微镜进行数字化处理。ViewsIQ软件用于图像采集和查看。这些载玻片还在Aperio ScanScope XT上以×40(0.25μm/像素)、1个z平面进行扫描,并使用ImageScope软件查看。数字玻片和载玻片由一名细胞技术人员进行筛查并标记/注释,随后由3名细胞病理学家进行复查。对于全景图像,细胞技术人员手动创建数字地图并选择代表性ROI以生成更高放大倍数的z轴堆叠。经过3周的洗脱期后,将全景图像与Aperio数字玻片和载玻片进行比较。
Panoptiq系统允许对厚涂片和细胞团进行精细聚焦。与载玻片相比,使用Panoptiq图像和Aperio图像时的平均筛查时间分别长5.5倍和1.8倍,但随着用户经验的增加,这一情况有所改善。所有3种模式之间的诊断一致性无统计学差异。所有模式下用户的诊断信心也相似。
具有1个z平面扫描功能的Aperio全玻片扫描仪和具有z轴堆叠功能的Panoptiq成像系统均适用于细胞病理学筛查和判读。然而,ROI z轴堆叠确实为克服数字细胞学玻片常见的聚焦问题提供了一种更优机制。与全玻片成像不同,使用Panoptiq系统获取代表性z轴堆叠图像需要一名经过培训的细胞学家来创建数字文件。《癌症细胞病理学》2017年;125:701 - 9。©2017美国癌症协会。