• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环丙沙星与多西环素联合甲硝唑治疗急性盆腔炎的比较

A comparison of ciprofloxacin with doxycycline plus metronidazole in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

作者信息

Heinonen P K, Teisala K, Miettinen A, Aine R, Punnonen R, Grönroos P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1989;60:66-73.

PMID:2756353
Abstract

We studied the clinical and microbiological response to two treatment regimens in 36 patients with acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). All patients were hospitalized and underwent laparoscopy and endometrial biopsy. Cervical, endometrial, tubal and peritoneal cultures for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, genital mycoplasmas, facultative and anaerobic bacteria and Herpes simplex virus were obtained. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: 16 women received ciprofloxacin 200 mg b.i.d. iv. for two days, followed by oral administration with 750 mg b.i.d. to complete a 14-day course of treatment. Twenty women received the combination of doxycycline and metronidazole according to a similar scheme of administration. The response was evaluated with repeated clinical examinations, monitoring of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum C-reactive protein concentration, and repeated microbial culture from the cervix. Ciprofloxacin treatment was successful in all nine patients with chlamydial or gonococcal PID and in six of seven with nonchlamydial nongonococcal PID. Doxycycline plus metronidazole regimen was successful in five of seven patients with chlamydial or gonococcal PID and in nine of 13 patients with nonchlamydial nongonococcal PID. Thus, the overall success rate was 94% (15 of 16) with ciprofloxacin and 70% (14 of 20) with doxycycline plus metronidazole. Our study suggests that ciprofloxacin is a promising new alternative for the treatment of acute PID.

摘要

我们研究了36例急性盆腔炎(PID)患者对两种治疗方案的临床和微生物学反应。所有患者均住院并接受腹腔镜检查和子宫内膜活检。获取了宫颈、子宫内膜、输卵管和腹膜的沙眼衣原体、淋病奈瑟菌、生殖支原体、兼性和厌氧菌以及单纯疱疹病毒培养物。患者被随机分为两个治疗组:16名女性静脉注射环丙沙星200mg,每日两次,共两天,随后口服750mg,每日两次,完成14天的治疗疗程。20名女性按照类似的给药方案接受多西环素和甲硝唑联合治疗。通过重复临床检查、监测红细胞沉降率和血清C反应蛋白浓度以及重复进行宫颈微生物培养来评估反应。环丙沙星治疗对所有9例衣原体或淋菌性PID患者以及7例非衣原体非淋菌性PID患者中的6例均成功。多西环素加甲硝唑方案对7例衣原体或淋菌性PID患者中的5例以及13例非衣原体非淋菌性PID患者中的9例成功。因此,环丙沙星的总体成功率为94%(16例中的15例),多西环素加甲硝唑为70%(20例中的14例)。我们的研究表明,环丙沙星是治疗急性PID的一种有前景的新选择。

相似文献

1
A comparison of ciprofloxacin with doxycycline plus metronidazole in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.环丙沙星与多西环素联合甲硝唑治疗急性盆腔炎的比较
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1989;60:66-73.
2
[Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole vs. cefoxitin/doxycycline: comparison of two therapy schedules for treatment of acute pelvic infection].[环丙沙星/甲硝唑与头孢西丁/多西环素:两种治疗急性盆腔感染方案的比较]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1994 Jun;54(6):337-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022851.
3
C-reactive protein in assessing antimicrobial treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.C反应蛋白在评估急性盆腔炎抗菌治疗中的应用
J Reprod Med. 1990 Oct;35(10):955-8.
4
Fecundity and morbidity following acute pelvic inflammatory disease treated with doxycycline and metronidazole.用强力霉素和甲硝唑治疗急性盆腔炎后的生育力和发病率
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;268(4):284-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-002-0376-6. Epub 2002 Oct 26.
5
A randomized double-blind comparison of moxifloxacin and doxycycline/metronidazole/ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease.莫西沙星与多西环素/甲硝唑/环丙沙星治疗急性单纯性盆腔炎的随机双盲对照研究
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Oct;20(10):690-5. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008495.
6
A randomized comparison of gentamicin-clindamycin and cefoxitin-doxycycline in the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.庆大霉素-克林霉素与头孢西丁-多西环素治疗急性盆腔炎的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):867-72.
7
[Antibiotic therapy in the treatment of inflammatory diseases in the minor pelvis].[抗生素疗法在治疗盆腔炎症性疾病中的应用]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996 Jul-Aug;124(7-8):193-6.
8
[Acute pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison of therapeutic protocols].[急性盆腔炎:治疗方案比较]
Minerva Ginecol. 1996 Jan-Feb;48(1-2):19-23.
9
Acute pelvic inflammatory disease.急性盆腔炎
Urol Clin North Am. 1984 Feb;11(1):65-81.
10
Treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的治疗。
Clin Pharm. 1990 Apr;9(4):275-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 20;8(8):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub3.
2
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: an abridged version of a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.盆腔炎症性疾病的抗生素治疗:Cochrane 系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析的精简版。
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Feb;95(1):21-27. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053693. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease.
盆腔炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD010285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010285.pub2.
4
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎性疾病
BMJ Clin Evid. 2013 Dec 11;2013:1606.
5
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Mar 10;2008:1606.
6
Pelvic inflammatory disease.盆腔炎
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):658-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.658.
7
Pelvic inflammatory disease epidemiology: what do we know and what do we need to know?盆腔炎流行病学:我们知道什么以及我们需要知道什么?
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Apr;76(2):80-7. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.2.80.
8
Ciprofloxacin. An updated review of its pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability.环丙沙星。对其药理学、治疗效果及耐受性的最新综述。
Drugs. 1996 Jun;51(6):1019-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651060-00010.
9
Quinolones in sexually transmitted diseases.
Drugs. 1993;45 Suppl 3:134-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199300453-00022.
10
The effect of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline plus metronidazole on lower genital tract flora in patients with proven pelvic inflammatory disease.环丙沙星、强力霉素联合甲硝唑对确诊为盆腔炎患者下生殖道菌群的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991;249(2):95-101. doi: 10.1007/BF02390368.