Suppr超能文献

[急性盆腔炎:治疗方案比较]

[Acute pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison of therapeutic protocols].

作者信息

Balbi G, Piscitelli V, Di Grazia F, Martini S, Balbi C, Cardone A

机构信息

II Clinica Ginecologica e Ostetrica, II Università degli Studi, Napoli.

出版信息

Minerva Ginecol. 1996 Jan-Feb;48(1-2):19-23.

PMID:8750486
Abstract

Acute pelvic inflammatory disease is a serious medical and economic consequence of sexually transmitted diseases among young women. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of gentamycin plus clindamycin with that of ceftazidime plus doxycycline in the treatment of hospitalized patients with acute pelvic inflammatory disease. A total of 78 patients with acute PID, hospitalized in II Obstretic and Gynecologic Clinic of II University of Naples (Italy), entered and randomized into two treatment groups: gentamycin plus clindamycin (N = 40) and ceftazidime plus doxycycline (N = 36). Patients were excluded if they were pregnant or were not over the age of 16 years of had a history of allergy to one of the drugs used in the Study of had hepatic disease or kidney trouble or had IUD. Acute PID was diagnosed by the following criteria: 1) lower abdominal pain; 2) cervical motion tenderness; 3) adnexal tenderness (all three should be present); plus at least one of the following additional criteria: a) temperature over 38 degrees C; b) leukocytosis (greater than 10.500 mm3); c) purulent material from the peritoneal cavity bt culdocentesis; d) inflammatory mass present on binomial pelvic examination and/or sonography; e) erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 15 mm/hr. Patients were enrolled into the study after obtaining informed consent, pretreatment and posttreatment cultures were obtained from the endocervix from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis and aerobic-anaerobic bacteria. The study has shown that the acute PID has a polymicrobal origins. Both antibiotic regimens were very effective in the treatment of the PID: a complete recovery was obtained in over 90% of patients.

摘要

急性盆腔炎是年轻女性性传播疾病导致的严重医学和经济后果。本研究旨在比较庆大霉素加克林霉素与头孢他啶加多西环素治疗住院急性盆腔炎患者的疗效和安全性。共有78例急性盆腔炎患者进入意大利那不勒斯第二大学第二妇产科诊所住院治疗,并随机分为两个治疗组:庆大霉素加克林霉素组(N = 40)和头孢他啶加多西环素组(N = 36)。如果患者怀孕、年龄不满16岁、对研究中使用的任何一种药物有过敏史、有肝脏疾病或肾脏问题或有宫内节育器,则被排除。急性盆腔炎的诊断依据以下标准:1)下腹部疼痛;2)宫颈举痛;3)附件压痛(三项均应存在);加上以下至少一项附加标准:a)体温超过38摄氏度;b)白细胞增多(大于10,500/mm³);c)经后穹窿穿刺从腹腔抽出脓性物质;d)双合诊盆腔检查和/或超声检查发现炎性包块;e)红细胞沉降率>15mm/小时。患者在获得知情同意后纳入研究,治疗前和治疗后从宫颈获取淋病奈瑟菌、沙眼衣原体及需氧-厌氧菌培养物。研究表明,急性盆腔炎有多种微生物起源。两种抗生素治疗方案对盆腔炎均非常有效:超过90%的患者完全康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验