Suppr超能文献

[蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)在哥伦比亚的验证]

[Validation of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Colombia].

作者信息

Cano Juan Fernando, Gomez Restrepo Carlos, Rondón Martín

机构信息

Centro de Investigaciones del Sistema Nervioso, Grupo CISNE, Bogotá, Colombia.

Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2016 Jul-Sep;45(3):146-55. doi: 10.1016/j.rcp.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To adapt and to validate the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Colombia.

METHODS

Observational study for scale validation. Validity criteria were used to determine the severity cut-off points of the tool. Taking into account sensitivity and specificity values, those cut points were contrasted with ICD-10 criteria for depression severity. A a factor analysis was performed. The internal consistencY was determined with the same sample of patients used for the validity criteria. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by evaluating the 22 records of the patients that consented to a video interview. Sensitivity to change was established through a second application of the scale in 28 subjects after a lapse of 14 to 28 days.

RESULTS

The study was performed in Bogotá, the tool was applied in 150 patients suffering from major depressive disorder. The cut-off point for moderate depression was 20 (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 96%), and the cut-off point for severe depression was 34 (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 92%). The tool appears as a unidimensional scale, which possesses a good internal consistency with (α=.9168). The findings of inter-rater reliability evaluation showed the scale as highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient=.9833). The instrument has a good sensitivity to change.

CONCLUSIONS

The Colombian version of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale has good psychometric properties and can be used in clinical practice and in clinical research in the field of depressive disorder.

摘要

目的

对蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)进行改编并在哥伦比亚进行验证。

方法

进行量表验证的观察性研究。使用效度标准来确定该工具的严重程度分界点。考虑敏感性和特异性值,将这些分界点与国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)的抑郁严重程度标准进行对比。进行了因子分析。使用用于效度标准的相同患者样本确定内部一致性。通过评估同意视频访谈的22名患者的记录来评估评分者间信度。通过在14至28天的间隔后对28名受试者再次应用该量表来确定对变化的敏感性。

结果

该研究在波哥大进行,该工具应用于150名重度抑郁症患者。中度抑郁的分界点为20(敏感性为98%;特异性为96%),重度抑郁的分界点为34(敏感性为98%;特异性为92%)。该工具表现为单维量表,具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.9168)。评分者间信度评估结果显示该量表高度可靠(组内相关系数 = 0.9833)。该工具对变化具有良好的敏感性。

结论

哥伦比亚版蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于抑郁症领域的临床实践和临床研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验