Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中镇静及镇痛药的应用:哌替啶/咪达唑仑、瑞芬太尼/咪达唑仑及单纯瑞芬太尼的双盲对照研究

Sedation and use of analgesics in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind comparison study of meperidine/midazolam, remifentanil/ midazolam, and remifentanil alone.

作者信息

Zhang Jinhua, Huang Yong, Li Zhao, Li Jian, Liu Kunpeng, Li Chenghui

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Nov;54(11):872-879. doi: 10.5414/CP202408.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and remifentanil with midazolam for conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

METHODS

99 patients scheduled for ERCP were randomly allocated to be treated with either meperidine/midazolam (group C, n = 33), remifentanil (group R, n = 33), or the remifentanil plus midazolam (group RM, n = 33). In group C, intermittent intravenous meperidine and midazolam were administrated during the procedure; in group R, remifentanil was infused continuously at a rate of 0.2 μg/kg/min for 5 minutes preoperatively, and decreased to 0.15 μg/kg/min when the procedure began; in group RM, midazolam 0.02 mg/kg was administered preoperatively, and remifentanil was administered in the same manner as in group R. Blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, O-saturation, and bispectral index (BIS) of the patients were recorded. The modified Aldrete scores, operator satisfaction scores, and side effects of the patients were noted as were the operative duration and anesthesia duration.

RESULTS

The blood pressure of the patients were significantly increased in group R and group C compared to baseline, and no significant changes were noted in group RM. Group RM experienced the least variability in heart rate. BIS was decreased the most in groups C and RM. Hypoxemia was observed most frequently in group RM. Nausea and pain was highest in group C. Amnesia was most often reported in groups C and RM. Operator satisfaction and modified Aldrete of the patients was increased in group R.

CONCLUSION

Both continuous remifentanil infusion alone and remifentanil plus midazolam provided satisfactory analgesia when used for sedation for ERCP, however, continuous remifentanil infusion alone resulted in increased operator satisfaction scores and expedited recoveryroom discharge.

摘要

目的

比较瑞芬太尼与咪达唑仑在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)中用于清醒镇静的疗效。

方法

99例计划行ERCP的患者被随机分配接受哌替啶/咪达唑仑治疗(C组,n = 33)、瑞芬太尼治疗(R组,n = 33)或瑞芬太尼加咪达唑仑治疗(RM组,n = 33)。C组在操作过程中静脉间断给予哌替啶和咪达唑仑;R组术前以0.2μg/kg/min的速率持续输注瑞芬太尼5分钟,操作开始时减至0.15μg/kg/min;RM组术前给予0.02mg/kg咪达唑仑,瑞芬太尼给药方式同R组。记录患者的血压、心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度和脑电双频指数(BIS)。记录患者的改良Aldrete评分、术者满意度评分及副作用,以及手术时间和麻醉时间。

结果

与基线相比,R组和C组患者血压显著升高,RM组未见显著变化。RM组心率变异性最小。C组和RM组BIS下降最多。RM组低氧血症最常见。C组恶心和疼痛发生率最高。C组和RM组遗忘发生率最高。R组患者的术者满意度和改良Aldrete评分升高。

结论

单独持续输注瑞芬太尼以及瑞芬太尼加咪达唑仑用于ERCP镇静时均提供了满意的镇痛效果,然而,单独持续输注瑞芬太尼提高了术者满意度评分并加快了恢复室出院速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验