Augustine Erika F, Dorsey E Ray, Hauser Robert A, Elm Jordan J, Tilley Barbara C, Kieburtz Karl K
Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):592-596. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665596. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
Communicating with trial participants is an important aspect of study conduct, relevant for informed consent and respect for participants. Group teleconferences are one means to convey information to trial participants. We used group teleconferences during an ongoing large-scale clinical trial to communicate important trial updates.
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson's Disease Longitudinal Study-1 trial studied creatine for treatment of early-stage Parkinson's disease. A total of 1741 participants enrolled at 45 sites in the United States and Canada to take part in a double-blind randomized trial of 5 years of treatment with creatine versus placebo. The study leadership held two teleconferences with study participants and their caregivers after each of two pre-specified interim analyses, for a total of four teleconferences. Each agenda included a presentation by study leadership followed by an open question and answer period. Teleconference recordings were made available to all site personnel and trial participants. Recordings were reviewed and abstracted for themes and topics of the presentations, participant questions, and discussion. Number of participants, connection time for each participant, number of questions, and caller connection time were summarized using descriptive statistics. After the first teleconferences, participants who remained on the call until the end were invited to complete a voluntary, four-question survey about the teleconference process. During the second teleconferences, participants were notified of premature study closure.
There were 258 callers for the first pair of teleconferences and 604 callers for the second pair of teleconferences. Study leaders answered more than 110 questions from study participants and caregivers across all calls. The most frequently asked question themes related to study drug, Parkinson's disease, side effects, future research, and data analysis. The initial teleconferences were well received by participants. Based on responses to the post-call survey, 98% (118/121) of participants found the call useful, 91% (115/127) were interested in future similar calls, 88% stated the call made them more likely to continue in the study (112/128), and 85% (90/106) were satisfied overall with study communications.
Teleconferences provide a convenient way to communicate with trial participants and can be used during the conduct of clinical trials to convey study progress and other information. For multi-site trials, teleconferences enable participants to engage directly with study leadership and to ask questions. Survey respondents were highly satisfied with the group teleconference experience. Future research is needed to determine whether teleconferences improve participants' satisfaction with clinical trial participation and improve retention.
与试验参与者沟通是研究实施的一个重要方面,对于知情同意和尊重参与者至关重要。小组电话会议是向试验参与者传达信息的一种方式。我们在一项正在进行的大规模临床试验中使用小组电话会议来传达重要的试验进展情况。
美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所帕金森病纵向研究-1试验研究了肌酸对早期帕金森病的治疗效果。共有1741名参与者在美国和加拿大的45个地点登记参加一项为期5年的肌酸与安慰剂双盲随机试验。在两次预先指定的中期分析之后,研究领导层分别与研究参与者及其护理人员举行了两次电话会议,总共四次电话会议。每次会议议程包括研究领导层的陈述,随后是开放的问答环节。电话会议录音提供给所有现场工作人员和试验参与者。对录音进行审查并提取其中陈述的主题和话题、参与者问题及讨论内容。使用描述性统计方法总结参与者人数、每位参与者的连接时间、问题数量和来电者连接时间。在第一次电话会议之后,邀请一直留在通话直到结束的参与者完成一项关于电话会议过程的自愿性四问题调查。在第二次电话会议期间,告知参与者研究提前结束。
第一对电话会议有258名来电者,第二对电话会议有604名来电者。研究负责人在所有通话中回答了研究参与者和护理人员提出的110多个问题。最常被问到的问题主题涉及研究药物、帕金森病、副作用、未来研究和数据分析。最初的电话会议受到参与者的好评。根据通话后调查的回复,98%(118/121)的参与者认为通话有用,91%(115/127)的参与者对未来类似的通话感兴趣,88%的参与者表示通话使他们更有可能继续参与研究(112/128),85%(90/106)的参与者总体上对研究沟通感到满意。
电话会议为与试验参与者沟通提供了一种便捷方式,可在临床试验实施过程中用于传达研究进展和其他信息。对于多中心试验,电话会议使参与者能够直接与研究领导层互动并提问。调查受访者对小组电话会议体验高度满意。需要进一步研究以确定电话会议是否能提高参与者对临床试验参与的满意度并提高留存率。