• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定全球健康临床研究中参与者沟通计划的最佳实践模板。

Creating a best practice template for participant communication plans in global health clinical studies.

机构信息

HealthAnalytix, LLC, 85 Larch St., Providence, RI, USA.

CollaborateUp Inc, 208 Noland Street, Falls Church, VA, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Mar 2;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07185-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07185-4
PMID:36864516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9983505/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trial participants have a right to be informed throughout the entire process of human subject research. As part of this pillar of research ethics, participants and other stakeholders should be made aware of research findings after a trial has been completed. Though participants have both a right, and a desire to be informed of research outcomes, studies show that they rarely receive communication about study findings. Our aim was (1) to understand what, if any, role communication plans play in current global health clinical research protocols and (2) to use our findings to develop a communication plan template tailored to clinical research carried out in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) while minimizing colonial assumptions. While the template was drafted in the LMIC context, the principles are universally applicable and should be considered best practices for all global health clinical trials.

METHODS

We carried out a mixed-method study over a period of 6 months to understand the role of communication with study participants and other stakeholders in clinical trials. The semiquantitative analysis included mining publicly available clinical trial protocols for communication-related language. Qualitative interviews (n = 7) were used to gather knowledge and insight from clinical trial experts to inform the development of a communication plan template.

RESULTS

None of the 48 mined clinical trial protocols included a communication plan. Of the 48, 21% (n = 21) protocols included communication-related language, and 10% (n = 5) described plans to share trial results with participants.

CONCLUSION

The use of communication plans in global health clinical trials is lacking. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth analysis of communication plans in clinical trials to date. We recommend that researchers utilize the developed communication plan template throughout the entire research process to ensure a human-centered approach to participant communication. This communication plan should apply to all phases of a research trial, with a particular emphasis on plans to share results in an accessible and engaging manner once the trial has been completed.

摘要

背景

临床试验参与者有权在人体研究的整个过程中获得信息。作为研究伦理的一个支柱,参与者和其他利益相关者应该在试验完成后了解研究结果。尽管参与者有权并且希望了解研究结果,但研究表明,他们很少收到关于研究结果的沟通。我们的目标是:(1)了解沟通计划在当前全球卫生临床研究方案中扮演的角色,如果有的话;(2)利用我们的发现,制定一个针对中低收入国家(LMIC)开展的临床研究的沟通计划模板,同时最大限度地减少殖民主义假设。虽然模板是在 LMIC 背景下起草的,但这些原则具有普遍性,应该被视为所有全球卫生临床试验的最佳实践。

方法

我们进行了一项为期 6 个月的混合方法研究,以了解与研究参与者和其他利益相关者沟通在临床试验中的作用。半定量分析包括挖掘公开可用的临床试验方案中与沟通相关的语言。定性访谈(n=7)用于从临床试验专家那里收集知识和见解,为沟通计划模板的制定提供信息。

结果

在挖掘的 48 项临床试验方案中,没有一项包括沟通计划。在这 48 项方案中,有 21%(n=21)的方案包括与沟通相关的语言,有 10%(n=5)的方案描述了与参与者分享试验结果的计划。

结论

全球卫生临床试验中沟通计划的使用不足。据我们所知,这是迄今为止对临床试验中沟通计划的首次深入分析。我们建议研究人员在整个研究过程中使用开发的沟通计划模板,以确保以参与者为中心的沟通方法。该沟通计划应适用于研究试验的所有阶段,特别强调在试验完成后以可访问和引人入胜的方式分享结果的计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/9808d96acdc0/13063_2023_7185_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/bc318558f81c/13063_2023_7185_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/a69f57c6833a/13063_2023_7185_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/9808d96acdc0/13063_2023_7185_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/bc318558f81c/13063_2023_7185_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/a69f57c6833a/13063_2023_7185_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/9983505/9808d96acdc0/13063_2023_7185_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Creating a best practice template for participant communication plans in global health clinical studies.制定全球健康临床研究中参与者沟通计划的最佳实践模板。
Trials. 2023 Mar 2;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07185-4.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Preparing accessible and understandable clinical research participant information leaflets and consent forms: a set of guidelines from an expert consensus conference.编写易于获取且通俗易懂的临床研究参与者信息手册和同意书:专家共识会议制定的一套指南
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 May 18;7(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00265-2.
7
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Effects of health literacy, screening, and participant choice on action plans for reducing unhealthy snacking in Australia: A randomised controlled trial.健康素养、筛查和参与者选择对减少澳大利亚不健康零食摄入行动计划的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 3;17(11):e1003409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003409. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Incorporating estimands into clinical trial statistical analysis plans.将估计量纳入临床试验统计分析计划中。
Clin Trials. 2022 Jun;19(3):285-291. doi: 10.1177/17407745221080463. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Current global practice and implications for future research on disseminating health research results to study participants: A systematic review.当前向研究参与者传播健康研究结果的全球实践及对未来研究的启示:一项系统综述。
PLoS Med. 2025 Aug 14;22(8):e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004569. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Refining Our "CRAFT": The Community Research Academy to Foster RepresenTation (CRAFT) Program.完善我们的“CRAFT”:促进代表性的社区研究学院(CRAFT)项目。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251355153. doi: 10.1177/10732748251355153. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
3
Exploratory interviews with Australian clinical research staff on how they communicate with participants.

本文引用的文献

1
A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research.促进卫生研究中伦理惠益分享的框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096.
2
Benefit Sharing for Human Genomics Research: Awareness and Expectations of Genomics Researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa.人类基因组研究的利益分享:撒哈拉以南非洲的基因组研究人员的意识和期望。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Nov;42(6):14-20. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500069.
3
Communicating and disseminating research findings to study participants: Formative assessment of participant and researcher expectations and preferences.
就澳大利亚临床研究人员如何与参与者沟通进行的探索性访谈。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02417-w.
向研究参与者传达和传播研究结果:对参与者和研究人员期望与偏好的形成性评估。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan 20;4(3):233-242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.9.
4
Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed.向患者传播临床试验结果的频率和形式:对PubMed索引的试验作者的调查
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 21;9(10):e032701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032701.
5
Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed.健康研究参与者未收到研究结果:需要一个协作解决方案。
Trials. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2200-4.
6
Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.关于研究传播的参与者认知与偏好的定性研究
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials.在多中心临床试验开展过程中与参与者进行沟通。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):592-596. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665596. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
8
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.健康研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
9
Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: A survey of cancer patients.成年患者对临床试验结果报告的看法:一项癌症患者调查
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):574-581. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665597. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Dissemination as Dialogue: Building Trust and Sharing Research Findings Through Community Engagement.作为对话的传播:通过社区参与建立信任并分享研究成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Mar 17;13:E38. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150473.