Forsgren Emma, Hartelius Lena, Saldert Charlotta
a Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden and.
b University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Dec;19(6):541-550. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2016.1216602. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
To explore the effects of an interactive workshop on medical students' knowledge and skill in communicating with people with acquired communication disorders.
Sixty-nine medical students received a lecture on acquired communication disorders. Thirty-six of these students also participated in a workshop where they practised using supportive strategies in interaction with a simulated patient with aphasia. All students completed a questionnaire exploring attitudes, confidence in knowledge and ability to suggest suitable supportive strategies pre- and post-lecture/workshop and 15 students were video recorded when interacting with a simulated patient pre- and post-workshop.
The results show no change in attitude in either student group, but both groups rated their confidence in knowledge as higher post-lecture/workshop. The students' ability to suggest supportive strategies post training was significantly higher only in the workshop group. Comparing post training results regarding knowledge and ability to suggest supportive strategies between the groups, higher ratings were found for the workshop group. The analysis of video recordings indicated that the students also used new supportive strategies and used strategies more frequently after the workshop.
An interactive workshop can improve medical students' knowledge and skills in communicating with people with acquired communication disorders.
探讨互动式工作坊对医学生与后天性沟通障碍患者沟通的知识和技能的影响。
六十九名医学生听取了关于后天性沟通障碍的讲座。其中三十六名学生还参加了一个工作坊,在那里他们练习在与模拟失语患者互动时使用支持性策略。所有学生在讲座/工作坊前后都完成了一份问卷,以探讨态度、对知识的信心以及提出合适支持性策略的能力,并且在工作坊前后与模拟患者互动时对15名学生进行了录像。
结果显示两组学生的态度均无变化,但两组学生在讲座/工作坊后对知识的信心评分均更高。仅工作坊组学生在培训后提出支持性策略的能力显著更高。比较两组在培训后关于知识和提出支持性策略能力的结果,工作坊组的评分更高。录像分析表明,学生在工作坊后也使用了新的支持性策略,并且更频繁地使用策略。
互动式工作坊可以提高医学生与后天性沟通障碍患者沟通的知识和技能。