Suppr超能文献

有或无均整器的右侧乳腺癌同步整合加量(SIB)放射治疗——一项治疗计划研究

Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiation therapy of right sided breast cancer with and without flattening filter - A treatment planning study.

作者信息

Maier Johannes, Knott Bernadette, Maerz Manuel, Loeschel Rainer, Koelbl Oliver, Dobler Barbara

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany.

Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug 31;11(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0687-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the two irradiation modes with (FF) and without flattening filter (FFF) for three different treatment techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiation therapy of patients with right sided breast cancer.

METHODS

An Elekta Synergy linac with Agility collimating device is used to simulate the treatment of 10 patients. Six plans were generated in Monaco 5.0 for each patient treating the whole breast and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) volume: intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and a tangential arc VMAT (tVMAT), each with and without flattening filter. Plan quality was assessed considering target coverage, sparing of the contralateral breast, the lungs, the heart and the normal tissue. All plans were verified by a 2D-ionisation-chamber-array and delivery times were measured and compared. The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Significantly best target coverage and homogeneity was achieved using VMAT FFF with V95% = (98.7 ± 0.8) % and HI = (8.2 ± 0.9) % for the SIB and V95% = (98.3 ± 0.7) % for the PTV, whereas tVMAT showed significantly lowest doses to the contralateral organs at risk with a Dmean of (0.7 ± 0.1) Gy for the contralateral lung, (1.0 ± 0.2) Gy for the contralateral breast and (1.4 ± 0.2) Gy for the heart. All plans passed the gamma evaluation with a mean passing rate of (99.2 ± 0.8) %. Delivery times were significantly reduced for VMAT and tVMAT but increased for IMRT, when FFF was used. Lowest delivery times were observed for tVMAT FFF with (1:20 ± 0:07) min.

CONCLUSION

Balancing target coverage, OAR sparing and delivery time, VMAT FFF and tVMAT FFF are considered the preferable of the investigated treatment options in simultaneous integrated boost irradiation of right sided breast cancer for the combination of an Elekta Synergy linac with Agility and the treatment planning system Monaco 5.0.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较有均整器(FF)和无均整器(FFF)的两种照射模式,用于右侧乳腺癌患者同步整合加量放射治疗的三种不同治疗技术。

方法

使用配备敏捷准直装置的医科达Synergy直线加速器模拟治疗10例患者。在Monaco 5.0中为每位患者生成六个计划,用于治疗全乳和同步整合加量(SIB)体积:调强放射治疗(IMRT)、容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)和切线弧形VMAT(tVMAT),每种模式均有有均整器和无均整器的情况。从靶区覆盖、对侧乳腺、肺、心脏和正常组织的保护等方面评估计划质量。所有计划均通过二维电离室阵列验证,并测量和比较了照射时间。采用Wilcoxon检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为0.05。

结果

使用VMAT FFF时,SIB的V95% =(98.7±0.8)%,HI =(8.2±0.9)%,PTV的V95% =(98.3±0.7)%,实现了显著最佳靶区覆盖和均匀性;而tVMAT对侧危险器官剂量显著最低,对侧肺的平均剂量(Dmean)为(0.7±0.1)Gy,对侧乳腺为(1.0±0.2)Gy,心脏为(1.4±0.2)Gy。所有计划均通过伽马评估,平均通过率为(99.2±0.8)%。当使用FFF时,VMAT和tVMAT的照射时间显著减少,而IMRT的照射时间增加。tVMAT FFF的照射时间最短,为(1:20±0:好7)分钟。

结论

在平衡靶区覆盖、危及器官保护和照射时间方面,对于配备敏捷的医科达Synergy直线加速器和Monaco 5.0治疗计划系统的组合,VMAT FFF和tVMAT FFF被认为是右侧乳腺癌同步整合加量照射中所研究治疗方案中的优选方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b353/5006633/eeb114affba5/13014_2016_687_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验