Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356510, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, 1013 NE 40th Street, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):654-662. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.154. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
Kidney stone imaging is an important diagnostic tool and initial step in deciding which therapeutic options to use for the management of kidney stones. Guidelines provided by the American College of Radiology, American Urological Association, and European Association of Urology differ regarding the optimal initial imaging modality to use to evaluate patients with suspected obstructive nephrolithiasis. Noncontrast CT of the abdomen and pelvis consistently provides the most accurate diagnosis but also exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Traditionally, ultrasonography has a lower sensitivity and specificity than CT, but does not require use of radiation. However, when these imaging modalities were compared in a randomized controlled trial they were found to have equivalent diagnostic accuracy within the emergency department. Both modalities have advantages and disadvantages. Kidney, ureter, bladder (KUB) plain film radiography is most helpful in evaluating for interval stone growth in patients with known stone disease, and is less useful in the setting of acute stones. MRI provides the possibility of 3D imaging without exposure to radiation, but it is costly and currently stones are difficult to visualize. Further developments are expected to enhance each imaging modality for the evaluation and treatment of kidney stones in the near future. A proposed algorithm for imaging patients with acute stones in light of the current guidelines and a randomized controlled trial could aid clinicians.
肾结石影像学检查是诊断肾结石的重要工具,也是决定治疗方案的初始步骤。美国放射学院、美国泌尿外科学会和欧洲泌尿外科学会的指南在评估疑似梗阻性肾结石患者时,对于最佳初始影像学检查方法的选择存在差异。腹部和盆腔非增强 CT 始终能提供最准确的诊断,但也会使患者暴露在电离辐射下。传统上,超声检查的敏感性和特异性低于 CT,但无需使用辐射。然而,在一项随机对照试验中,这两种影像学检查方法的诊断准确性相当。这两种方法都有其优缺点。在评估已知结石病患者的结石间隔生长时,肾脏、输尿管、膀胱(KUB)平片最有帮助,而在急性结石的情况下则不太有用。MRI 提供了无辐射暴露的 3D 成像的可能性,但成本较高,目前结石难以可视化。预计未来会有更多的发展来增强每种影像学检查方法,以便在不久的将来评估和治疗肾结石。鉴于目前的指南和一项随机对照试验,为急性肾结石患者制定影像学检查的算法可以帮助临床医生。