• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感觉因素不足以在复杂视野中定义眼球扫视目标。

Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields.

作者信息

Lévy-Schoen A, Coëffé C, Jacobs A M

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, CNRS UA316, Université René Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

Brain Behav Evol. 1989;33(2-3):80-4. doi: 10.1159/000115904.

DOI:10.1159/000115904
PMID:2758306
Abstract

In most normal visual search situations, the environment is filled with a variety of stimuli, and selection among possible saccade targets is necessary. Current theories of visuomotor mechanisms must take into account not only the classical 'retinal error' input signal, but also perceptual and decisional factors as well as task-specific strategies adopted by the subjects. Experiments are reported in which eye movements are recorded in tasks requiring ocular saccades to be made onto target letters indicated by a peripherally visible mark or embedded within lines of homogeneous background letters. The results show how nonsensory factors interact with visual determinants in the preparation of the exploratory saccades. Expectations concerning the visibility of the sought-for target influence the spatial and temporal parameters of the eye movement which will be executed.

摘要

在大多数正常的视觉搜索情境中,环境中充满了各种刺激,因此有必要在可能的扫视目标之间进行选择。当前的视觉运动机制理论不仅必须考虑经典的“视网膜误差”输入信号,还必须考虑感知和决策因素以及受试者采用的特定任务策略。本文报告了一些实验,在这些实验中,记录了在需要将眼球扫视到由周边可见标记指示或嵌入在均匀背景字母行中的目标字母的任务中的眼动情况。结果表明了非感觉因素在探索性扫视准备过程中如何与视觉决定因素相互作用。对所寻找目标可见性的预期会影响即将执行的眼动的空间和时间参数。

相似文献

1
Sensory factors are insufficient to define the ocular saccade goal in complex visual fields.感觉因素不足以在复杂视野中定义眼球扫视目标。
Brain Behav Evol. 1989;33(2-3):80-4. doi: 10.1159/000115904.
2
Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.周边视觉中小写字母的感知:基于扫视潜伏期的辨别矩阵。
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jul;46(1):95-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03208079.
3
Suppression of task-related saccades by electrical stimulation in the primate's frontal eye field.电刺激灵长类动物额叶眼区对与任务相关的扫视运动的抑制作用。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 May;77(5):2252-67. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2252.
4
Saccadic eye movements to peripherally discriminated visual targets.向周边辨别视觉目标的眼球快速运动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Feb;8(1):113-26. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.1.113.
5
Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.猴子的扫视反应时间:眼动程序的提前准备是快速扫视发生的主要原因。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3666.
6
Perceptual localization of visual stimuli flashed during saccades.
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Feb;45(2):162-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03208051.
7
Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.眼动与跨注视整合信息。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):529-44. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.4.529.
8
Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory.正电子发射断层扫描对自主眼球扫视运动和空间工作记忆的研究。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jan;75(1):454-68. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.1.454.
9
Human oculomotor system accounts for 3-D eye orientation in the visual-motor transformation for saccades.人类动眼系统在扫视的视觉-运动转换中负责三维眼球定向。
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2274-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.5.2274.
10
Independent allocation of attention to eye and hand targets in coordinated eye-hand movements.在协调的眼手运动中,注意力独立分配到眼睛和手部目标上。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):339-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797610397666. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploratory eye movements to pictures in childhood-onset schizophrenia and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).儿童期起病的精神分裂症和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者对图片的探索性眼动。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;27(1):35-49. doi: 10.1023/a:1022662323823.