Bech N H, Hulst A H, Spuijbroek J A, van Leuken L L A, Haverkamp D
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Louwesweg 6, Amsterdam 1066 EC, The Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesia, Slotervaart Hospital, Louwesweg 6, Amsterdam 1066 EC, The Netherlands.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 May 13;3(3):181-9. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw015. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Hip arthroscopy is a fast growing orthopedic field of expertise. As in any field of surgery adequate postoperative pain management regimes are of utmost importance. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge on anesthetic options for perioperative pain management for hip arthroscopy. We searched the Pubmed/Medline and Embase database for literature and included 10 studies for our analysis. Because of the variety of pain scales and different ways of measured pain no meta-analysis could be performed and a descriptive review is performed. There are several types of pain regimens that can mostly be divided in two groups: local anesthetics and nerve blocks. Included studies show a rather large variation in reported visual analogue scale scores, post anesthesia care unit admission time and opioid usage. There are several anesthetic options available for hip arthroscopy. Different studies use different dosages, anesthetic regimens and different protocols; this partly explains the differences between studies with similar techniques. Peripheral nerve blocks seems promising but regarding current literature no clear recommendation can be made about what the best perioperative pain management option is, an overview of all reported techniques is given.
髋关节镜检查是一个快速发展的骨科专业领域。与任何外科领域一样,充分的术后疼痛管理方案至关重要。本综述的目的是概述髋关节镜检查围手术期疼痛管理麻醉选择的当前知识。我们在PubMed/Medline和Embase数据库中检索文献,纳入10项研究进行分析。由于疼痛量表的多样性和测量疼痛的不同方式,无法进行荟萃分析,因此进行描述性综述。有几种疼痛管理方案,主要可分为两组:局部麻醉剂和神经阻滞。纳入的研究显示,报告的视觉模拟量表评分、麻醉后护理单元入院时间和阿片类药物使用情况存在相当大的差异。髋关节镜检查有几种麻醉选择。不同的研究使用不同的剂量、麻醉方案和不同的方案;这部分解释了采用类似技术的研究之间的差异。周围神经阻滞似乎很有前景,但根据当前文献,对于最佳的围手术期疼痛管理选择无法给出明确建议,本文给出了所有报告技术的概述。