Barrientos Cristián, Barahona Maximiliano, Diaz Jorge, Brañes Julian, Chaparro Felipe, Hinzpeter Jaime
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universidad De Chile, Santos Dumontt 999, Independencia, Santiago 8380456, Region Metropolitana, Chile.
2. Chief of Musculoskeletal Radiology Department.Hospital Clínico Universidad De Chile.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Apr 26;3(3):223-8. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw014. eCollection 2016 Aug.
The normal value of alpha angle is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the alpha angle in asymptomatic volunteers versus patients who had undergone surgery for symptomatic cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and determine a diagnostic cut-off value for symptomatic cam impingement. This is a diagnostic test study. Cases were defined as those patients who had undergone surgery for symptomatic cam or mixed type FAI. Controls were defined as asymptomatic volunteers, with no history of hip pain who had undergone a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis for a non-joint or bone-related reason. In both groups, the alpha angle was measured in an oblique axial CT reconstruction of the femoral neck. A logistic regression model was first estimated and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was then calculated. The diagnostic cut-off value selected was the one that maximizes sensitivity and specificity. Data were analysed from 38 consecutive cases of cam or mixed FAI and 101 controls. The average alpha angle was 67°(±12°) among cases and 48°°(±5°) among controls. An odds ratio of 1.28 [1.18-1.39] was obtained. A ROC curve of 0.96 [0.93-0.99] was calculated, and using an alpha angle of 57° as the diagnostic cut-off value, provided a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 95%. If a patient complains of hip pain and an alpha angle of 57° is found in CT, strongly suggest that cam impingement is causing the pain.
α角的正常值存在争议。本研究的目的是比较无症状志愿者与因有症状的凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)接受手术的患者之间的α角,并确定有症状凸轮撞击症的诊断临界值。这是一项诊断测试研究。病例定义为那些因有症状的凸轮型或混合型FAI接受手术的患者。对照组定义为无症状志愿者,无髋部疼痛病史,因非关节或骨骼相关原因接受过腹部和骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)。在两组中,均在股骨颈的斜轴向CT重建中测量α角。首先估计逻辑回归模型,然后计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。选择的诊断临界值是使敏感性和特异性最大化的值。分析了38例连续的凸轮型或混合型FAI病例和101例对照的数据。病例组的平均α角为67°(±12°),对照组为48°(±5°)。获得的优势比为1.28 [1.18 - 1.39]。计算出的ROC曲线为0.96 [0.93 - 0.99],以57°的α角作为诊断临界值时,敏感性为92%,特异性为95%。如果患者主诉髋部疼痛,且在CT中发现α角为57°,则强烈提示凸轮撞击症是导致疼痛的原因。