• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻求公共医疗系统(SUS)进行不孕治疗的夫妇的社会经济概况。

Socioeconomic profile of couples seeking the public healthcare system (SUS) for infertility treatment.

作者信息

Tavares Rachel, Cunha Gisele, Aguiar Lilian, Duarte Shaytner Campos, Cardinot Nilza, Bastos Elizabeth, Coelho Francisco

机构信息

Centro de Infertilidade e Medicina Fetal do Norte Fluminense / Departamento de Medicina Reprodutiva do Hospital Escola Alvaro Alvim. Campos dos Goytacazes/RJ, Brazil.

Faculdade de Medicina de Campos dos Goytacazes. Campos dos Goytacazes/RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Aug 1;20(3):112-7. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160026.

DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20160026
PMID:27584602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5264374/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The number of couples seeking assisted reproduction services in pursuit of the dream of conceiving a child is growing. In developing countries 10 to 15% of couples of childbearing age cannot bear a child by natural means and the impossibility of conceiving a child has a significant impact on the health and well-being of the couple. The aim of this study was to evaluate the socioeconomic profile and the main causes of infertility of couples seeking assisted reproduction treatment through the public healthcare system.

METHODS

We analyzed 600 medical records of couples who sought infertility treatment at the public healthcare system, and we divided them into three groups according to age: 35 years, 35 to 39, and 40 years or more. In each group we analyzed the cause of infertility, the number of children of the spouses, the education level and family income.

RESULTS

The main cause of infertility was male-related in 34%, followed by tubal factor in 31.5%. We found that 56% of the women were less than 35 years old and 58% of the couples earned less than 3 minimum wages.

CONCLUSION

The profile of the couples was: low-income, low education and less than 35 years of age. The cost of assisted reproductive treatment is still high, being restricted to couples of higher socioeconomic statuses. An effective public healthcare policy could minimize this problem by improving the quality of care for couples seeking infertility treatment at the public healthcare system.

摘要

目的

寻求辅助生殖服务以实现生育梦想的夫妇数量正在增加。在发展中国家,10%至15%的育龄夫妇无法自然受孕,无法生育对夫妇的健康和幸福有重大影响。本研究的目的是通过公共医疗系统评估寻求辅助生殖治疗的夫妇的社会经济状况和不孕的主要原因。

方法

我们分析了600对在公共医疗系统寻求不孕治疗的夫妇的病历,并根据年龄将他们分为三组:35岁以下、35至39岁、40岁及以上。在每组中,我们分析了不孕原因、配偶的子女数量、教育水平和家庭收入。

结果

不孕的主要原因中,男性相关因素占34%,其次是输卵管因素占31.5%。我们发现,56%的女性年龄小于35岁,58%的夫妇收入低于3份最低工资。

结论

这些夫妇的特征是:低收入、低教育水平且年龄小于35岁。辅助生殖治疗的费用仍然很高,仅限于社会经济地位较高的夫妇。一项有效的公共医疗政策可以通过提高公共医疗系统中寻求不孕治疗的夫妇的护理质量来尽量减少这个问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/e42f9ef33e57/jbra-20-03-0112-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/ed3f1891d157/jbra-20-03-0112-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/cd37e11e5e9e/jbra-20-03-0112-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/e42f9ef33e57/jbra-20-03-0112-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/ed3f1891d157/jbra-20-03-0112-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/cd37e11e5e9e/jbra-20-03-0112-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49d1/5264374/e42f9ef33e57/jbra-20-03-0112-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic profile of couples seeking the public healthcare system (SUS) for infertility treatment.寻求公共医疗系统(SUS)进行不孕治疗的夫妇的社会经济概况。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016 Aug 1;20(3):112-7. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160026.
2
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.丹麦的不孕症与辅助生殖。流行病学及心理社会后果。
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
3
[Analysis of the demographic profile of patients treated for infertility using assisted reproductive techniques in 2005-2010].[2005年至2010年使用辅助生殖技术治疗不孕症患者的人口统计学特征分析]
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Jul;84(7):609-14. doi: 10.17772/gp/1612.
4
Infertility in resource-constrained settings: moving towards amelioration.资源受限环境下的不孕不育:走向改善。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Feb;26(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
5
Fertility needs and funding in couples with blood-borne viral infection.血源病毒感染夫妇的生育需求和资金。
HIV Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):90-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00749.x. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
6
Out-of-pocket fertility patient expense: data from a multicenter prospective infertility cohort.自费生育患者的费用:来自多中心前瞻性不孕队列的数据。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.083. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
7
The search for the principle of justice for infertile couples: characterization of the brazilian population and bioethical discussion.寻找不孕夫妇的正义原则:巴西人口特征与生物伦理探讨。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00947-4.
8
Effectiveness of a mixed lifestyle program in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a study protocol.辅助生殖技术治疗中夫妇混合生活方式方案的有效性:研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01652-6.
9
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of clients seeking assisted conception at Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊凯贾拉各斯州立大学教学医院寻求辅助生殖的客户的社会人口学和临床特征。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;37(7):902-905. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1309365. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
10
Management of infertility in low resource countries.资源匮乏国家的不孕不育管理。
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116 Suppl 1:77-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02311.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of CGG repeat length and AGG interruption patterns on FMR1 alleles with female infertility.FMR1基因座上CGG重复序列长度及AGG中断模式与女性不孕的关联
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 17;16:1609471. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1609471. eCollection 2025.
2
Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates.生育不受隔离影响:2019 年冠状病毒病大流行对体外受精临床妊娠率的影响。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;45(3):142-148. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768459. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
Randomized prospective study comparing conventional In Vitro Fertilization technique to Intravaginal Culture with the INVOCELL™ device for 3 and 5 days.

本文引用的文献

1
Latin America and access to Assisted Reproductive Techniques: A Brazilian perspective.拉丁美洲与辅助生殖技术的可及性:巴西视角
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2014 Jun 27;18(2):47-51. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140004.
2
Public funding of and access to in vitro fertilization.体外受精的公共资金投入与获取途径。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1948-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1213687.
3
National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys.1990 年以来全球、区域和国家不孕症患病率的趋势:对 277 项健康调查的系统分析。
随机前瞻性研究比较传统的体外受精技术与 INVOCELL™ 装置 3 天和 5 天的阴道内培养。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Sep 12;27(3):360-366. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20220042.
4
Echinacoside Protects Against Dysfunction of Spermatogenesis Through the MAPK Signaling Pathway.松果菊苷通过 MAPK 信号通路保护精子发生功能障碍。
Reprod Sci. 2022 May;29(5):1586-1596. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00707-y. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: characterization of centers and profiles from patients treated.巴西的辅助生殖技术:治疗患者的中心和特征描述。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2020 Jul 14;24(3):235-240. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200001.
6
Twin Peaks: A spatial and temporal study of twinning rates in Brazil.《双峰:巴西孪生率的时空研究》
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0200885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200885. eCollection 2018.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Inequitable access to assisted reproductive technology for the low-income Brazilian population: a qualitative study.巴西低收入人群获得辅助生殖技术的机会不平等:一项定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2054-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der158. Epub 2011 May 25.
5
Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility.母爱至上:不孕的痛苦。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):881-2. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.011210.
6
Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review.调查不孕不育患者的生活质量和健康相关生活质量:系统评价。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;31(2):101-10. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337.
7
Infertility service use among U.S. women: 1995 and 2002.美国女性的不孕不育服务利用情况:1995 年和 2002 年。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):725-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.049. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
8
A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management.关注不孕不育的预防、检测和管理,以促进公共卫生。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):16.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.046. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
9
Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.健康差异与不孕症:州级保险授权的影响
Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.038.
10
Infertility: from a personal to a public health problem.不孕症:从个人问题到公共卫生问题。
Public Health Rep. 1999 Nov-Dec;114(6):494-511. doi: 10.1093/phr/114.6.494.