Liddell Belinda J, Nickerson Angela, Sartor Lauren, Ivancic Lorraine, Bryant Richard A
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia.
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Despite unprecedented numbers of migrants internationally, little is known about the mental health needs of immigrant groups residing in common countries of resettlement. The majority of studies support the 'healthy migrant hypothesis', but few studies have examined: 1) shifts in prevalence patterns across generations; 2) how prevalence relates to disability in immigrant groups. Our study examined the prevalence of common mental disorders and disability in first and second generation migrants to Australia. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence rates of affective, anxiety, and substance use disorders were obtained from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (N = 8841). First generation immigrants (born overseas) and second generation immigrants (both parents overseas) from non-English and English speaking backgrounds were compared to an Australian-born cohort. Disability was indexed by days out of role and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS12). First generation immigrants with non-English speaking (1G-NE) backgrounds evidenced reduced prevalence of common mental disorders relative to the Australian-born population (adjusted odds ratio 0.5 [95% CI 0.38-0.66]). This lower prevalence was not observed in second generation immigrant cohorts. While overall levels of disability were equal between all groups (p > 0.05), mental health-related disability was elevated in the 1G-NE group relative to the Australian-born group (p = 0.012). The findings challenge the overarching notion of the "healthy migrant" and suggest a dissociation between reduced prevalence and elevated mental health-related disability amongst first generation immigrants with non-English speaking backgrounds. These findings highlight the heterogeneous psychiatric needs of first and second generation immigrants.
尽管国际移民数量空前,但对于居住在主要安置国的移民群体的心理健康需求却知之甚少。大多数研究支持“健康移民假说”,但很少有研究考察:1)不同代际患病率模式的变化;2)移民群体中患病率与残疾之间的关系。我们的研究调查了第一代和第二代澳大利亚移民中常见精神障碍和残疾的患病率。从澳大利亚全国心理健康与幸福调查(N = 8841)中获取情感、焦虑和物质使用障碍的12个月患病率和终生患病率。将来自非英语和英语背景的第一代移民(出生在海外)和第二代移民(父母均在海外)与澳大利亚出生的队列进行比较。残疾情况通过失能天数和世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS12)来衡量。与澳大利亚出生的人群相比,具有非英语背景的第一代移民(1G-NE)中常见精神障碍的患病率有所降低(调整后的优势比为0.5 [95%置信区间0.38 - 0.66])。在第二代移民队列中未观察到这种较低的患病率。虽然所有组的总体残疾水平相等(p > 0.05),但相对于澳大利亚出生的组,1G-NE组中与心理健康相关的残疾有所增加(p = 0.012)。这些发现挑战了“健康移民”的总体概念,并表明在具有非英语背景的第一代移民中,患病率降低与心理健康相关残疾增加之间存在脱节。这些发现突出了第一代和第二代移民不同的精神科需求。