Kirsch Alexander H, Lyko Raphael, Nilsson Lars-Göran, Beck Werner, Amdahl Michael, Lechner Petra, Schneider Andreas, Wanner Christoph, Rosenkranz Alexander R, Krieter Detlef H
Clinical Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.
Compared to high-flux dialysis membranes, novel medium cut-off (MCO) membranes show greater permeability for larger middle molecules.
In two prospective, open-label, controlled, randomized, crossover pilot studies, 39 prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients were studied in four dialysis treatments as follows: study 1, three MCO prototype dialyzers (AA, BB and CC with increasing permeability) and one high-flux dialyzer in HD; and study 2, two MCO prototype dialyzers (AA and BB) in HD and high-flux dialyzers in HD and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Primary outcome was lambda free light chain (λFLC) overall clearance. Secondary outcomes included overall clearances and pre-to-post-reduction ratios of middle and small molecules, and safety of MCO HD treatments.
MCO HD provided greater λFLC overall clearance [least square mean (standard error)] as follows: study 1: MCO AA 8.5 (0.54), MCO BB 11.3 (0.51), MCO CC 15.0 (0.53) versus high-flux HD 3.6 (0.51) mL/min; study 2: MCO AA 10.0 (0.58), MCO BB 12.5 (0.57) versus high-flux HD 4.4 (0.57) and HDF 6.2 (0.58) mL/min. Differences between MCO and high-flux dialyzers were consistently significant in mixed model analysis (each P < 0.001). Reduction ratios of λFLC were greater for MCO. Clearances of α1-microglobulin, complement factor D, kappa FLC (κFLC) and myoglobin were generally greater with MCO than with high-flux HD and similar to or greater than clearances with HDF. Albumin loss was moderate with MCO, but greater than with high-flux HD and HDF.
MCO HD removes a wide range of middle molecules more effectively than high-flux HD and even exceeds the performance of high-volume HDF for large solutes, particularly λFLC.
与高通量透析膜相比,新型中截留量(MCO)膜对较大的中分子具有更高的通透性。
在两项前瞻性、开放标签、对照、随机、交叉试点研究中,对39例维持性血液透析(HD)患者进行了以下四种透析治疗:研究1,在HD中使用三种MCO原型透析器(AA、BB和CC,通透性递增)和一种高通量透析器;研究2,在HD中使用两种MCO原型透析器(AA和BB),在HD和血液透析滤过(HDF)中使用高通量透析器。主要结局是游离轻链(λFLC)的总清除率。次要结局包括中小分子的总清除率和前后降低率,以及MCO HD治疗的安全性。
MCO HD提供了更高的λFLC总清除率[最小二乘均值(标准误)],如下所示:研究1:MCO AA 8.5(0.54),MCO BB 11.3(0.51),MCO CC 15.0(0.53),而高通量HD为3.6(0.51)mL/min;研究2:MCO AA 10.0(0.58),MCO BB 12.5(0.57),而高通量HD为4.4(0.57),HDF为6.2(0.58)mL/min。在混合模型分析中,MCO和高通量透析器之间的差异始终具有显著性(每个P<0.001)。MCO的λFLC降低率更大。MCO对α1-微球蛋白、补体因子D、κ轻链(κFLC)和肌红蛋白的清除率通常高于高通量HD,且与HDF的清除率相似或更高。MCO导致的白蛋白丢失适中,但高于高通量HD和HDF。
MCO HD比高通量HD更有效地清除多种中分子,甚至在清除大溶质(特别是λFLC)方面超过了高通量HDF的性能。