Suppr超能文献

新型中截留量透析器的血液透析性能

Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers.

作者信息

Kirsch Alexander H, Lyko Raphael, Nilsson Lars-Göran, Beck Werner, Amdahl Michael, Lechner Petra, Schneider Andreas, Wanner Christoph, Rosenkranz Alexander R, Krieter Detlef H

机构信息

Clinical Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared to high-flux dialysis membranes, novel medium cut-off (MCO) membranes show greater permeability for larger middle molecules.

METHODS

In two prospective, open-label, controlled, randomized, crossover pilot studies, 39 prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients were studied in four dialysis treatments as follows: study 1, three MCO prototype dialyzers (AA, BB and CC with increasing permeability) and one high-flux dialyzer in HD; and study 2, two MCO prototype dialyzers (AA and BB) in HD and high-flux dialyzers in HD and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Primary outcome was lambda free light chain (λFLC) overall clearance. Secondary outcomes included overall clearances and pre-to-post-reduction ratios of middle and small molecules, and safety of MCO HD treatments.

RESULTS

MCO HD provided greater λFLC overall clearance [least square mean (standard error)] as follows: study 1: MCO AA 8.5 (0.54), MCO BB 11.3 (0.51), MCO CC 15.0 (0.53) versus high-flux HD 3.6 (0.51) mL/min; study 2: MCO AA 10.0 (0.58), MCO BB 12.5 (0.57) versus high-flux HD 4.4 (0.57) and HDF 6.2 (0.58) mL/min. Differences between MCO and high-flux dialyzers were consistently significant in mixed model analysis (each P < 0.001). Reduction ratios of λFLC were greater for MCO. Clearances of α1-microglobulin, complement factor D, kappa FLC (κFLC) and myoglobin were generally greater with MCO than with high-flux HD and similar to or greater than clearances with HDF. Albumin loss was moderate with MCO, but greater than with high-flux HD and HDF.

CONCLUSIONS

MCO HD removes a wide range of middle molecules more effectively than high-flux HD and even exceeds the performance of high-volume HDF for large solutes, particularly λFLC.

摘要

背景

与高通量透析膜相比,新型中截留量(MCO)膜对较大的中分子具有更高的通透性。

方法

在两项前瞻性、开放标签、对照、随机、交叉试点研究中,对39例维持性血液透析(HD)患者进行了以下四种透析治疗:研究1,在HD中使用三种MCO原型透析器(AA、BB和CC,通透性递增)和一种高通量透析器;研究2,在HD中使用两种MCO原型透析器(AA和BB),在HD和血液透析滤过(HDF)中使用高通量透析器。主要结局是游离轻链(λFLC)的总清除率。次要结局包括中小分子的总清除率和前后降低率,以及MCO HD治疗的安全性。

结果

MCO HD提供了更高的λFLC总清除率[最小二乘均值(标准误)],如下所示:研究1:MCO AA 8.5(0.54),MCO BB 11.3(0.51),MCO CC 15.0(0.53),而高通量HD为3.6(0.51)mL/min;研究2:MCO AA 10.0(0.58),MCO BB 12.5(0.57),而高通量HD为4.4(0.57),HDF为6.2(0.58)mL/min。在混合模型分析中,MCO和高通量透析器之间的差异始终具有显著性(每个P<0.001)。MCO的λFLC降低率更大。MCO对α1-微球蛋白、补体因子D、κ轻链(κFLC)和肌红蛋白的清除率通常高于高通量HD,且与HDF的清除率相似或更高。MCO导致的白蛋白丢失适中,但高于高通量HD和HDF。

结论

MCO HD比高通量HD更有效地清除多种中分子,甚至在清除大溶质(特别是λFLC)方面超过了高通量HDF的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f091/5837492/1e5ef9f671f1/gfw310f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验