Suppr超能文献

中国血液透析患者中,高通量血液透析与血液透析滤过清除中分子物质的比较。

Comparison of middle molecule removal with expanded hemodialysis versus haemodiafiltration among Chinese hemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Gan Liangying, Gu Leyi, Ge Yongchun, Lin Hongli, Li Yiwen, Chen Fengling, Li Wenge, Gao Bihu, Ding Feng, Zhang Xinzhou, Shi Zhenwei, Ji Jiayao, Yao Qiang, Keller Brad, Sarkar Surupa, Zuo Li

机构信息

Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2498093. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2498093. Epub 2025 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare uremic toxin removal with expanded hemodialysis against post-dilution online haemodiafiltration therapy in Chinese patients with chronic kidney failure in a single treatment.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel, multicenter trial enrolled prevalent patients on hemodialysis. The study endpoints were to establish the non-inferiority of expanded hemodialysis versus haemodiafiltration in removing beta-2-microglobulin (β2M) and lambda-free light chains (λFLC) and to evaluate the reduction ratios of urea, alpha-1-microglobulin (α1M), myoglobin, complement factor D, kappa-free light chains (κFLC) and Chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40) during a mid-week dialysis session. The 95% confidence intervals of the difference in λFLC and β2M reduction ratios with expanded hemodialysis were compared against pre-defined non-inferiority margins (-3.783 and -7.848, respectively). Non-inferior reduction ratios were tested for superiority using hierarchical testing.

RESULTS

Overall, 274 adult patients were randomized to expanded hemodialysis ( = 138) or haemodiafiltration ( = 136). No differences in demographics, baseline characteristics, and treatment parameters were observed between the arms. The reduction ratio of λFLC with expanded hemodialysis was superior to haemodiafiltration; reduction ratio difference of 17.0% [95% confidence interval: 14.8%, 19.2%]. The reduction ratio of β2M with expanded hemodialysis was non-inferior to haemodiafiltration; reduction ratio difference of -1.2% [95% confidence interval: -2.5%, 0.2%]. Expanded hemodialysis showed significantly higher removal of α1M, YKL-40, complement factor D, myoglobin, and κFLC than haemodiafiltration therapy. There were no significant differences in Kt/V, urea reduction ratio, and the rate of complications between the arms.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of expanded hemodialysis therapy in removing multiple middle molecules compared to haemodiafiltration therapy, with no observed differences in the overall safety of Chinese patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较单次治疗中,延长血液透析与后置稀释在线血液透析滤过疗法对中国慢性肾衰竭患者尿毒症毒素的清除效果。

方法

本随机、对照、开放标签、平行、多中心试验纳入了正在接受血液透析的患者。研究终点是确定延长血液透析与血液透析滤过在清除β2微球蛋白(β2M)和游离λ轻链(λFLC)方面的非劣效性,并评估在一周中间时段透析过程中尿素、α1微球蛋白(α1M)、肌红蛋白、补体因子D、游离κ轻链(κFLC)和几丁质酶3样蛋白1(YKL-40)的降低率。将延长血液透析时λFLC和β2M降低率差异的95%置信区间与预先定义的非劣效性界值(分别为-3.783和-7.848)进行比较。使用分层检验对非劣效降低率进行优越性检验。

结果

总体而言,274例成年患者被随机分为延长血液透析组(n = 138)或血液透析滤过组(n = 136)。两组在人口统计学、基线特征和治疗参数方面未观察到差异。延长血液透析时λFLC的降低率优于血液透析滤过;降低率差异为17.0%[95%置信区间:14.8%,19.2%]。延长血液透析时β2M的降低率不劣于血液透析滤过;降低率差异为-1.2%[95%置信区间:-2.5%,0.2%]。延长血液透析显示出比血液透析滤过疗法显著更高的α1M、YKL-40、补体因子D、肌红蛋白和κFLC清除率。两组在Kt/V、尿素清除率和并发症发生率方面无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,与血液透析滤过疗法相比,延长血液透析疗法在清除多种中分子方面有效,且在中国患者的总体安全性方面未观察到差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验