• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准血液透析中ELISIO-HX和Xevonta-Hi透析器的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of the ELISIO-HX and Xevonta-Hi Dialyzers in Standard Hemodialysis.

作者信息

Villacorta Linaza Blanca, Román Cabezas Mario, Sánchez-Pozo María Cristina, Alcaide Lara María Paz, Cabra-Rodríguez Rocío, Toro Prieto Francisco Javier

机构信息

Departamento de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain.

Departamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Av. Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013 Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;15(4):596. doi: 10.3390/life15040596.

DOI:10.3390/life15040596
PMID:40283150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12028760/
Abstract

As chronic kidney disease (CKD) prevalence rises, optimizing hemodialysis remains essential. While online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is the gold standard, expanded hemodialysis (HDx), i.e., using high-performance dialyzers in standard hemodialysis, remains the most common clinical practice. Medium cutoff (MCO) membranes aim to enhance middle-molecule removal while preserving protein selectivity, although most studies evaluate them in OL-HDF. To this end, this study aims to compare the Xevonta-Hi (B. Braun), a high-flux (HF) polysulfone dialyzer, and the ELISIO-HX (Nipro), an MCO polyethersulfone dialyzer, in standard hemodialysis. In a prospective, observational study, seven stable patients sequentially received treatment with each dialyzer over four weeks. Pre- and post-dialysis levels of small and middle uremic molecules and inflammatory markers-including procalcitonin, prolactin, serum amyloid A, placental growth factor, interleukin-6, haptoglobin, ceruloplasmin, transferrin, prealbumin, and C-reactive protein-were measured. Both dialyzers demonstrated excellent clearance of small and middle molecules, with no significant differences in efficacy. Albumin and total protein losses remained minimal. Moderate reductions in serum amyloid A, placental growth factor, and interleukin-6 were observed, while no significant reductions occurred in the remaining inflammatory markers. These findings support the safety and effectiveness of both MCO and HF dialyzers in standard hemodialysis.

摘要

随着慢性肾脏病(CKD)患病率的上升,优化血液透析仍然至关重要。虽然在线血液透析滤过(OL-HDF)是金标准,但扩展血液透析(HDx),即在标准血液透析中使用高性能透析器,仍然是最常见的临床实践。中截流(MCO)膜旨在增强中分子清除率,同时保持蛋白质选择性,尽管大多数研究是在OL-HDF中对其进行评估的。为此,本研究旨在比较标准血液透析中高通量(HF)聚砜透析器Xevonta-Hi(贝朗公司)和MCO聚醚砜透析器ELISIO-HX(日机装公司)。在一项前瞻性观察研究中,7名病情稳定的患者在4周内依次接受了每种透析器的治疗。测量了透析前和透析后小和中尿毒症分子以及炎症标志物的水平,包括降钙素原、催乳素、血清淀粉样蛋白A、胎盘生长因子、白细胞介素-6、触珠蛋白、铜蓝蛋白、转铁蛋白、前白蛋白和C反应蛋白。两种透析器对小分子和中分子均显示出优异的清除率,疗效无显著差异。白蛋白和总蛋白损失保持在最低水平。观察到血清淀粉样蛋白A、胎盘生长因子和白细胞介素-6有适度降低,而其余炎症标志物无显著降低。这些发现支持了MCO和HF透析器在标准血液透析中的安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/d569871c06a5/life-15-00596-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/4bb2c5705f0a/life-15-00596-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/fe07fb7a26fb/life-15-00596-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/d569871c06a5/life-15-00596-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/4bb2c5705f0a/life-15-00596-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/fe07fb7a26fb/life-15-00596-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49df/12028760/d569871c06a5/life-15-00596-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of the ELISIO-HX and Xevonta-Hi Dialyzers in Standard Hemodialysis.标准血液透析中ELISIO-HX和Xevonta-Hi透析器的对比分析
Life (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;15(4):596. doi: 10.3390/life15040596.
2
Efficacy and Safety of the Medium Cut-Off Elisio HX Dialyzer.中等通量 Elisio HX 透析器的疗效和安全性。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(1):68-74. doi: 10.1159/000524644. Epub 2022 May 12.
3
Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins.高通量、超高通量、中分子截留血液透析与在线血液透析滤过清除尿毒症毒素的比较。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(3):309-318. doi: 10.1159/000526891. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
A randomized trial comparing medium cut-off membrane dialyzers with online hemodiafiltration for uremic toxins clearance in hemodialysis patients.一项比较中截流膜透析器与在线血液透析滤过清除血液透析患者尿毒症毒素效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 14;15(1):5467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89197-5.
5
High-permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high-flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration.替代现行透析器的高通量选择,用于进行高通量血液透析和在线后稀释血液透析滤过。
Artif Organs. 2019 Oct;43(10):1014-1021. doi: 10.1111/aor.13480. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
6
Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.中分子 cutoff 透析器与 8 种血液透析滤过透析器:使用全球清除评分的比较。
Blood Purif. 2019;48(2):167-174. doi: 10.1159/000499759. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Comparison of four medium cut-off dialyzers.四种中通量透析器的比较
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Jul 13;15(12):2292-2299. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac167. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Comparison of 2 medium cutoff dialyzers versus on-line hemodiafiltration regarding depurative ability and albumin loss: An uncontrolled clinical research.比较 2 种中分子截留透析器与在线血液透析滤过在清除能力和白蛋白丢失方面的差异:一项非对照临床研究。
Artif Organs. 2023 Mar;47(3):589-594. doi: 10.1111/aor.14466. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
9
Comparison of Circulating Levels of Uremic Toxins in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Medium Cut-Off Membranes and High-Flux Membranes: Theranova in Sisli Hamidiye Etfal (THE SHE) Randomized Control Study.中通量和高通量血液透析患者血液中尿毒症毒素水平的比较:希思利哈米迪耶埃特法尔的 Theranova(THE SHE)随机对照研究。
Blood Purif. 2020;49(6):733-742. doi: 10.1159/000508061. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers.新型中截留量透析器的血液透析性能
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jan 1;32(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw310.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic kidney disease and the global public health agenda: an international consensus.慢性肾脏病与全球公共卫生议程:国际共识。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024 Jul;20(7):473-485. doi: 10.1038/s41581-024-00820-6. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
Improved β2-Microglobulin and Phosphorous Removal with Expanded Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration versus High-Flux Hemodialysis: A Cross-Over Randomized Clinical Trial.扩展血液透析和在线血液透析滤过与高通量血液透析相比,可改善β2-微球蛋白和磷的清除:一项交叉随机临床试验。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(7-8):712-720. doi: 10.1159/000531355. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure.
血液滤过或血液透析对肾衰竭死亡率的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 24;389(8):700-709. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304820. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Choice of the Dialysis Modality: Practical Considerations.透析方式的选择:实际考量
J Clin Med. 2023 May 7;12(9):3328. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093328.
5
Impact of Membrane Modification and Surface Immobilization Techniques on the Hemocompatibility of Hemodialysis Membranes: A Critical Review.膜修饰和表面固定技术对血液透析膜血液相容性的影响:批判性综述
Membranes (Basel). 2022 Oct 28;12(11):1063. doi: 10.3390/membranes12111063.
6
Expanded hemodialysis: a new concept of renal replacement therapy.扩展血液透析:肾脏替代治疗的新概念。
J Investig Med. 2023 Jan;71(1):38-41. doi: 10.1136/jim-2022-002431.
7
Efficacy and Safety of the Medium Cut-Off Elisio HX Dialyzer.中等通量 Elisio HX 透析器的疗效和安全性。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(1):68-74. doi: 10.1159/000524644. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Medium Cutoff Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis Membranes and Clinical Outcomes: A Cohort Study Using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting.中截留量与高通量血液透析膜及临床结局:一项使用逆概率处理加权的队列研究
Kidney Med. 2022 Feb 7;4(4):100431. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100431. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
The scientific principles and technological determinants of haemodialysis membranes.血液透析膜的科学原理与技术决定因素
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Dec 27;14(Suppl 4):i5-i16. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab184. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Medium cut-off dialyzer improves erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance in a hepcidin-independent manner in maintenance hemodialysis patients: results from a randomized controlled trial.中通量透析器可在维持性血液透析患者中独立于铁调素途径改善红细胞生成刺激剂抵抗:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 29;10(1):16062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73124-x.