• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语音感知的TRACE模型与模糊逻辑模型之间的测试。

Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception.

作者信息

Massaro D W

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 1989 Jul;21(3):398-421. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90014-5.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0285(89)90014-5
PMID:2758786
Abstract

The TRACE model of speech perception (McClelland & Elman, 1986) is contrasted with a fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP) (Oden & Massaro, 1978). The central question is how the models account for the influence of multiple sources of information on perceptual judgment. Although the two models can make somewhat similar predictions, the assumptions underlying the models are fundamentally different. The TRACE model is built around the concept of interactive activation, whereas the FLMP is structured in terms of the integration of independent sources of information. The models are tested against test results of an experiment involving the independent manipulation of bottom-up and top-down sources of information. Using a signal detection framework, sensitivity and bias measures of performance can be computed. The TRACE model predicts that top-down influences from the word level influence sensitivity at the phoneme level, whereas the FLMP does not. The empirical results of a study involving the influence of phonological context and segmental information on the perceptual recognition of a speech segment are best described without any assumed changes in sensitivity. To date, not only is a mechanism of interactive activation not necessary to describe speech perception, it is shown to be wrong when instantiated in the TRACE model.

摘要

语音感知的TRACE模型(麦克莱兰和埃尔曼,1986年)与感知的模糊逻辑模型(FLMP)(奥登和马萨罗,1978年)形成对比。核心问题是这些模型如何解释多种信息来源对感知判断的影响。尽管这两种模型能做出有些相似的预测,但模型背后的假设却有着根本差异。TRACE模型围绕交互激活的概念构建,而FLMP则依据独立信息源的整合来构建。这些模型通过一项涉及自下而上和自上而下信息源独立操控的实验测试结果进行检验。利用信号检测框架,可以计算出表现的敏感性和偏差度量。TRACE模型预测,来自单词层面的自上而下影响会影响音素层面的敏感性,而FLMP则不然。一项涉及语音语境和音段信息对语音片段感知识别影响的研究的实证结果,在不假设敏感性有任何变化的情况下能得到最佳描述。迄今为止,不仅交互激活机制对于描述语音感知并非必要,而且在TRACE模型中实例化时还被证明是错误的。

相似文献

1
Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception.语音感知的TRACE模型与模糊逻辑模型之间的测试。
Cogn Psychol. 1989 Jul;21(3):398-421. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90014-5.
2
Integration versus interactive activation: the joint influence of stimulus and context in perception.整合与交互激活:刺激与情境在感知中的联合影响。
Cogn Psychol. 1991 Oct;23(4):558-614. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90006-a.
3
Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception.在感知模糊逻辑模型框架内的视听整合效率测试。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):784-9. doi: 10.1121/1.429611.
4
Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.阅读中的视觉、正字法、语音和词汇影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Dec;20(6):1107-28. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.6.1107.
5
Information integration in cross-modal pattern recognition: an argument for acquired modularity.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996 Jun;92(1):79-104. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00002-x.
6
Independence of lexical context and phonological information in speech perception.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Jul;21(4):1053-64.
7
Phoneme restoration and empirical coverage of interactive activation and adaptive resonance models of human speech processing.音素恢复以及人类语音处理的交互式激活和自适应共振模型的实证覆盖范围。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar;137(3):1481-92. doi: 10.1121/1.4904543.
8
Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities.听力损失者的言语感知:多种模式的协同作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Feb;42(1):21-41. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4201.21.
9
Cognitive style and perception: the relationship between category width and speech perception, categorization, and discrimination.认知风格与感知:类别宽度与言语感知、分类及辨别之间的关系。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Spring;106(1):25-49.
10
Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug;43(3):647-77. doi: 10.1080/14640749108400991.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance of subcategorical information during speech perception: revisiting misunderstood limitations.言语感知过程中次范畴信息的维持:重新审视被误解的局限性
J Mem Lang. 2025 Feb;140. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2024.104565. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.与断言相反,反馈有助于提高单词识别能力:反馈和侧抑制如何在噪声中增强信号。
Cognition. 2024 Jan;242:105661. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105661. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Sketching the Landscape of Speech Perception Research (2000-2020): A Bibliometric Study.
勾勒语音感知研究的图景(2000 - 2020):一项文献计量学研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 2;13:822241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822241. eCollection 2022.
4
More why, less how: What we need from models of cognition.更多的“为什么”,更少的“怎么做”:我们需要认知模型提供什么。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104688. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104688. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
Active listening.主动倾听。
Hear Res. 2021 Jan;399:107998. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107998. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Categorical Encoding of Vowels in Primary Auditory Cortex.元音的范畴化编码于初级听觉皮层。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 21;30(2):618-627. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz112.
7
Combining Behavioral and ERP Methodologies to Investigate the Differences Between McGurk Effects Demonstrated by Cantonese and Mandarin Speakers.结合行为学和事件相关电位方法研究粤语和普通话使用者所表现出的麦格克效应之间的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 4;12:181. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00181. eCollection 2018.
8
A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.一种因果推理模型解释了麦格克效应及其他不一致视听言语的感知。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 16;13(2):e1005229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005229. eCollection 2017 Feb.
9
Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data.句子对声学语音处理的影响:多模态成像数据的格兰杰因果分析
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):841-855. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1029498. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?我们所说的语言理解中的预测是什么意思?
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(1):32-59. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299. Epub 2015 Nov 13.