Suppr超能文献

成人潜伏性结核感染的初级保健筛查与治疗:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告及系统评价

Primary Care Screening and Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

作者信息

Kahwati Leila C, Feltner Cynthia, Halpern Michael, Woodell Carol L, Boland Erin, Amick Halle R, Weber Rachel Palmieri, Jonas Daniel E

机构信息

RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-Based Practice Center3Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill4Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):970-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10357.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Five to ten percent of individuals with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) progress to active tuberculosis (TB) disease. Identifying and treating LTBI is a key component of the strategy for reducing the burden of TB disease.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence about targeted screening and treatment for LTBI among adults in primary care settings to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its 1996 recommendation.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and trial registries, searched through August 3, 2015; references from pertinent articles; and experts. Literature surveillance was conducted through May 31, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies of LTBI screening, LTBI treatment with recommended pharmacotherapy, or accuracy of the tuberculin skin test (TST) or interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs). Studies of individuals for whom LTBI screening and treatment is part of public health surveillance or disease management were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. When at least 3 similar studies were available, random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, reliability, active TB disease, mortality, hepatotoxicity, and other harms.

RESULTS

The review included 72 studies (n = 51 711). No studies evaluated benefits and harms of screening compared with no screening. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of the TST at both 5-mm and 10-mm induration thresholds were 0.79 (5-mm: 95% CI, 0.69-0.89 [8 studies, n = 803]; 10 mm: 95% CI, 0.71-0.87 [11 studies; n = 988]), and those for IGRAs ranged from 0.77 to 0.90 (57 studies; n = 4378). Pooled estimates for specificity of the TST at the 10-mm and 15-mm thresholds and for IGRAs ranged from 0.95 to 0.99 (34 studies; n = 23 853). A randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 24 weeks of isoniazid in individuals with pulmonary fibrotic lesions and LTBI (n = 27 830) found a reduction in absolute risk of active TB at 5 years from 1.4% to 0.5% (relative risk [RR], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.24-0.52]) and an increase in absolute risk for hepatoxicity from 0.1% to 0.5% (RR, 4.59 [95% CI, 2.03-10.39]) for 24 weeks of daily isoniazid compared with placebo. An RCT (n = 6886) found that 3 months of once-weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid was noninferior to 9 months of isoniazid alone for preventing active TB. The risk difference for hepatoxicity comparing isoniazid with rifampin ranged from 3% to 7%, with a pooled RR of 3.29 (95% CI, 1.72-6.28 [3 RCTs; n = 1327]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

No studies evaluated the benefits and harms of screening compared with no screening. Both the TST and IGRAs are moderately sensitive and highly specific within countries with low TB burden. Treatment reduced the risk of active TB among the populations included in this review. Isoniazid is associated with higher rates of hepatotoxicity than placebo or rifampin.

摘要

重要性

5%至10%的潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)个体进展为活动性结核病(TB)。识别和治疗LTBI是减轻结核病负担策略的关键组成部分。

目的

回顾基层医疗环境中成人LTBI靶向筛查和治疗的证据,以支持美国预防服务工作组更新其1996年的建议。

数据来源

检索截至2015年8月3日的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和试验注册库;相关文章的参考文献;以及专家。通过2016年5月31日进行文献监测。

研究选择

关于LTBI筛查、用推荐药物疗法治疗LTBI或结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)或干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)准确性的英文研究。排除将LTBI筛查和治疗作为公共卫生监测或疾病管理一部分的个体研究。

数据提取和综合

两名研究者独立审查摘要和全文文章。当至少有3项类似研究时,采用随机效应荟萃分析来生成结局的汇总估计值。

主要结局和测量指标

敏感性、特异性、可靠性、活动性结核病、死亡率、肝毒性和其他危害。

结果

该综述纳入72项研究(n = 51711)。没有研究评估筛查与不筛查相比的益处和危害。TST在硬结阈值为5毫米和10毫米时的敏感性汇总估计值分别为0.79(5毫米:95%CI,0.69 - 0.89 [8项研究,n = 803];10毫米:95%CI,0.71 - 0.87 [11项研究;n = 988]),IGRAs的敏感性汇总估计值范围为0.77至0.90(57项研究;n = 4378)。TST在10毫米和15毫米阈值时的特异性汇总估计值以及IGRAs的特异性汇总估计值范围为0.95至0.99(34项研究;n = 23853)。一项针对有肺纤维化病变和LTBI的个体(n = 27830)进行的24周异烟肼随机临床试验(RCT)发现,与安慰剂相比,每日服用异烟肼24周使5年时活动性结核的绝对风险从1.4%降至0.5%(相对风险[RR],0.35 [95%CI,0.24 - 0.52]),肝毒性的绝对风险从0.1%增至0.5%(RR,4.59 [95%CI,2.03 - 10.39])。一项RCT(n = 6886)发现,每周一次利福喷丁加异烟肼治疗3个月在预防活动性结核方面不劣于单独使用异烟肼治疗9个月。异烟肼与利福平相比肝毒性的风险差异范围为3%至7%,汇总RR为3.29(95%CI,1.72 - 6.28 [3项RCT;n = 1327])。

结论和相关性

没有研究评估筛查与不筛查相比的益处和危害。在结核病负担较低的国家,TST和IGRAs均具有中等敏感性和高特异性。治疗降低了本综述所纳入人群中活动性结核的风险。异烟肼与安慰剂或利福平相比,肝毒性发生率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验