• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探针水平的t检验:一种识别微阵列数据中具有统计学意义基因的替代方法。

t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data.

作者信息

Boareto Marcelo, Caticha Nestor

机构信息

Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Microarrays (Basel). 2014 Dec 16;3(4):340-51. doi: 10.3390/microarrays3040340.

DOI:10.3390/microarrays3040340
PMID:27600352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4979051/
Abstract

Microarray data analysis typically consists in identifying a list of differentially expressed genes (DEG), i.e., the genes that are differentially expressed between two experimental conditions. Variance shrinkage methods have been considered a better choice than the standard t-test for selecting the DEG because they correct the dependence of the error with the expression level. This dependence is mainly caused by errors in background correction, which more severely affects genes with low expression values. Here, we propose a new method for identifying the DEG that overcomes this issue and does not require background correction or variance shrinkage. Unlike current methods, our methodology is easy to understand and implement. It consists of applying the standard t-test directly on the normalized intensity data, which is possible because the probe intensity is proportional to the gene expression level and because the t-test is scale- and location-invariant. This methodology considerably improves the sensitivity and robustness of the list of DEG when compared with the t-test applied to preprocessed data and to the most widely used shrinkage methods, Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) and Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA). Our approach is useful especially when the genes of interest have small differences in expression and therefore get ignored by standard variance shrinkage methods.

摘要

微阵列数据分析通常在于识别一组差异表达基因(DEG),即那些在两种实验条件下差异表达的基因。对于选择DEG而言,方差缩减方法被认为比标准t检验是更好的选择,因为它们校正了误差与表达水平的相关性。这种相关性主要由背景校正中的误差引起,而背景校正误差对低表达值的基因影响更为严重。在此,我们提出一种识别DEG的新方法,该方法克服了这一问题,且不需要背景校正或方差缩减。与当前方法不同,我们的方法易于理解和实施。它包括直接对归一化强度数据应用标准t检验,这是可行的,因为探针强度与基因表达水平成正比,并且t检验是尺度不变和位置不变的。与应用于预处理数据的t检验以及最广泛使用的缩减方法微阵列显著性分析(SAM)和微阵列数据线性模型(LIMMA)相比,该方法显著提高了DEG列表的灵敏度和稳健性。我们的方法特别有用,尤其是当感兴趣的基因在表达上差异较小,因此会被标准方差缩减方法忽略时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/eb006c228f99/microarrays-03-00340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/d494f5996b29/microarrays-03-00340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/f30f4045898b/microarrays-03-00340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/a23243a533eb/microarrays-03-00340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/eb006c228f99/microarrays-03-00340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/d494f5996b29/microarrays-03-00340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/f30f4045898b/microarrays-03-00340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/a23243a533eb/microarrays-03-00340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84d/4979051/eb006c228f99/microarrays-03-00340-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
t-Test at the Probe Level: An Alternative Method to Identify Statistically Significant Genes for Microarray Data.探针水平的t检验:一种识别微阵列数据中具有统计学意义基因的替代方法。
Microarrays (Basel). 2014 Dec 16;3(4):340-51. doi: 10.3390/microarrays3040340.
2
A weighted average difference method for detecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data.一种用于从微阵列数据中检测差异表达基因的加权平均差异法。
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2008 Jun 26;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-3-8.
3
Ranking differentially expressed genes from Affymetrix gene expression data: methods with reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity.对Affymetrix基因表达数据中的差异表达基因进行排名:具有可重复性、敏感性和特异性的方法。
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2009 Apr 22;4:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-4-7.
4
Distributional fold change test - a statistical approach for detecting differential expression in microarray experiments.分布倍数变化检验——一种用于检测微阵列实验中差异表达的统计方法。
Algorithms Mol Biol. 2012 Nov 2;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-7-29.
5
A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.一种基于收缩样本方差的新检验统计量,用于在小型微阵列实验中识别差异表达基因。
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2008 Feb 29;2:145-56. doi: 10.4137/bbi.s473.
6
Support vector machine quantile regression for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray analysis.用于在微阵列分析中检测差异表达基因的支持向量机分位数回归
Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(5):459-67.
7
Applying shrinkage variance estimators to the TOST test in high dimensional settings.在高维环境中将收缩方差估计器应用于TOST检验。
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2014 Jun;13(3):323-41. doi: 10.1515/sagmb-2013-0045.
8
Biological validation of differentially expressed genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia identified by applying multiple statistical methods to oligonucleotide microarrays.通过对寡核苷酸微阵列应用多种统计方法鉴定慢性淋巴细胞白血病中差异表达基因的生物学验证。
J Mol Diagn. 2005 Aug;7(3):337-45. doi: 10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60562-4.
9
A nonparametric likelihood ratio test to identify differentially expressed genes from microarray data.一种用于从微阵列数据中识别差异表达基因的非参数似然比检验。
Appl Bioinformatics. 2006;5(4):267-76. doi: 10.2165/00822942-200605040-00009.
10
A standardized fold change method for microarray differential expression analysis used to reveal genes involved in acute rejection in murine allograft models.一种用于微阵列差异表达分析的标准化倍数变化方法,用于揭示小鼠同种异体移植模型中参与急性排斥反应的基因。
FEBS Open Bio. 2018 Jan 25;8(3):481-490. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12343. eCollection 2018 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Should we abandon the t-test in the analysis of gene expression microarray data: a comparison of variance modeling strategies.我们是否应该放弃基因表达微阵列数据分析中的 t 检验:方差建模策略的比较。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 3;5(9):e12336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012336.
2
The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models.《基因芯片质量控制(MAQC)-II 研究:基于基因芯片的预测模型的开发和验证的常见实践》。
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Aug;28(8):827-38. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1665. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
3
Intensity dependent estimation of noise in microarrays improves detection of differentially expressed genes.
基于强度的微阵列噪声估计可提高差异表达基因的检测能力。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 27;11:400. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-400.
4
A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data.探针水平和探针集模型在小样本基因表达数据中的比较。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 May 26;11:281. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-281.
5
A review of statistical methods for preprocessing oligonucleotide microarrays.寡核苷酸微阵列的预处理统计方法综述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Dec;18(6):533-41. doi: 10.1177/0962280209351924.
6
Evaluation of microarray preprocessing algorithms based on concordance with RT-PCR in clinical samples.基于与临床样本中逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的一致性对微阵列预处理算法进行评估。
PLoS One. 2009 May 21;4(5):e5645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005645.
7
What does PLIER really do?PLIER究竟是做什么的?
Cancer Inform. 2008;6:423-31. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
8
Empirical Bayes models for multiple probe type microarrays at the probe level.探针水平上多探针类型微阵列的经验贝叶斯模型。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 20;9:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-156.
9
The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements.微阵列质量控制(MAQC)项目展示了基因表达测量在不同平台间和同一平台内的可重复性。
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1151-61. doi: 10.1038/nbt1239.
10
Probe-level linear model fitting and mixture modeling results in high accuracy detection of differential gene expression.探针水平线性模型拟合和混合建模能够高精度检测差异基因表达。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug 25;7:391. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-391.