• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康信息交换市场的策略博弈模型。

A strategic gaming model for health information exchange markets.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Systems Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Mar;21(1):119-130. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9382-2. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10729-016-9382-2
PMID:27600378
Abstract

Current market conditions create incentives for some providers to exercise control over patient data in ways that unreasonably limit its availability and use. Here we develop a game theoretic model for estimating the willingness of healthcare organizations to join a health information exchange (HIE) network and demonstrate its use in HIE policy design. We formulated the model as a bi-level integer program. A quasi-Newton method is proposed to obtain a strategy Nash equilibrium. We applied our modeling and solution technique to 1,093,177 encounters for exchanging information over a 7.5-year period in 9 hospitals located within a three-county region in Florida. Under a set of assumptions, we found that a proposed federal penalty of up to $2,000,000 has a higher impact on increasing HIE adoption than current federal monetary incentives. Medium-sized hospitals were more reticent to adopt HIE than large-sized hospitals. In the presence of collusion among multiple hospitals to not adopt HIE, neither federal incentives nor proposed penalties increase hospitals' willingness to adopt. Hospitals' apathy toward HIE adoption may threaten the value of inter-connectivity even with federal incentives in place. Competition among hospitals, coupled with volume-based payment systems, creates no incentives for smaller hospitals to exchange data with competitors. Medium-sized hospitals need targeted actions (e.g., outside technological assistance, group purchasing arrangements) to mitigate market incentives to not adopt HIE. Strategic game theoretic models help to clarify HIE adoption decisions under market conditions at play in an extremely complex technology environment.

摘要

当前的市场条件促使一些医疗机构以不合理的方式控制患者数据,从而限制其可用性和使用。在这里,我们开发了一种博弈论模型来估计医疗机构加入健康信息交换(HIE)网络的意愿,并展示了其在 HIE 政策设计中的应用。我们将模型制定为一个双层整数规划。提出了一种拟牛顿法来获得策略纳什均衡。我们将我们的建模和求解技术应用于佛罗里达州三个县内的 9 家医院在 7.5 年期间交换信息的 1,093,177 次就诊。在一组假设下,我们发现拟议的联邦罚款最高可达 200 万美元,比当前的联邦货币激励措施对增加 HIE 采用的影响更大。中型医院比大型医院更不愿意采用 HIE。在多家医院串通不采用 HIE 的情况下,联邦激励措施和拟议的罚款都不会增加医院采用 HIE 的意愿。医院对 HIE 采用的冷漠可能会威胁到互联互通的价值,即使有联邦激励措施存在。医院之间的竞争,加上基于数量的支付系统,并没有为较小的医院与竞争对手交换数据创造激励。中型医院需要采取有针对性的行动(例如,外部技术援助、集体采购安排)来减轻不采用 HIE 的市场激励。战略博弈论模型有助于在极其复杂的技术环境中阐明市场条件下的 HIE 采用决策。

相似文献

1
A strategic gaming model for health information exchange markets.健康信息交换市场的策略博弈模型。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Mar;21(1):119-130. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9382-2. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
Engagement In Hospital Health Information Exchange Is Associated With Vendor Marketplace Dominance.参与医院健康信息交换与供应商市场主导地位相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1286-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1215.
3
Investing in Post-Acute Care Transitions: Electronic Information Exchange Between Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities.投资于急性后期护理过渡:医院与长期护理机构之间的电子信息交换。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Health information exchange network under collaboration, cooperation, and competition: A game-theoretic approach.协作、合作和竞争下的健康信息交换网络:一种博弈论方法。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2023 Sep;26(3):516-532. doi: 10.1007/s10729-023-09640-9. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
5
Adoption and use of various health information exchange methods for sending inside health information in US hospitals.美国医院内部发送健康信息的各种健康信息交换方法的采用和使用。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105156. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
6
Health systems' use of enterprise health information exchange vs single electronic health record vendor environments and unplanned readmissions.医疗体系对企业健康信息交换与单一电子健康记录供应商环境的使用,与非计划性再入院率。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):989-998. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz116.
7
Gaps in health information exchange between hospitals that treat many shared patients.医院之间在治疗许多共同患者的健康信息交流方面存在差距。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1114-1121. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy089.
8
Legal Barriers to the Growth of Health Information Exchange-Boulders or Pebbles?健康信息交换增长的法律障碍——巨石还是卵石?
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):110-143. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12313.
9
Health information exchange among U.S. hospitals: who's in, who's out, and why?美国医院间的健康信息交流:谁参与,谁不参与,以及原因是什么?
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar;2(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
10
Assessing the impact of health information exchange on hospital data breach risk.评估健康信息交换对医院数据泄露风险的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105149. Epub 2023 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.将健康数据转化为可操作的信息:健康信息交换的最新进展和未来机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):203-214. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Uncovering Hospitalists' Information Needs from Outside Healthcare Facilities in the Context of Health Information Exchange Using Association Rule Learning.在健康信息交换背景下,运用关联规则学习从外部医疗机构中挖掘住院医师的信息需求。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Nov 25;6(4):684-97. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-06-RA-0068. eCollection 2015.
2
Electronic Health Record Adoption In US Hospitals: Progress Continues, But Challenges Persist.美国医院采用电子健康记录:进展仍在继续,但挑战依然存在。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2174-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0992. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
A user needs assessment to inform health information exchange design and implementation.
一项用于为健康信息交换设计与实施提供依据的用户需求评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Oct 12;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0207-x.
4
Health information exchange among U.S. hospitals: who's in, who's out, and why?美国医院间的健康信息交流:谁参与,谁不参与,以及原因是什么?
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar;2(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Leveraging health information technology to achieve the "triple aim" of healthcare reform.利用健康信息技术实现医疗改革的“三重目标”。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):849-56. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv022. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Despite the spread of health information exchange, there is little evidence of its impact on cost, use, and quality of care.尽管健康信息交换有所普及,但几乎没有证据表明其对医疗成本、医疗服务利用及医疗质量产生了影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):477-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0729.
7
Barriers over time to full implementation of health information exchange in the United States.美国在实现健康信息交换全面实施方面面临的障碍。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 Sep 30;2(2):e26. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3625.
8
Usage and effect of health information exchange: a systematic review.健康信息交换的使用和效果:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):803-11. doi: 10.7326/M14-0877.
9
Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings.尽管电子健康记录(EHR)的采用取得了实质性进展,但在医疗机构中,健康信息交换和患者参与度仍然较低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1672-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0445. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
10
Health information exchange, system size and information silos.健康信息交换、系统规模与信息孤岛
J Health Econ. 2014 Jan;33:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 30.