Obokata Masaru, Takeuchi Masaaki, Negishi Kazuaki, Ohte Nobuyuki, Izumo Masaki, Yamashita Eiji, Ebato Mio, Yuda Satoshi, Kurabayashi Masahiko, Nakatani Satoshi
Department of Medicine and Biological Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;118(9):1356-1362. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.060. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
The purposes of this study were to investigate whether heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) share echocardiographic predictors and elucidate E/(e' × s') that predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) independent of other echocardiographic parameters in each HF group. We assessed tissue Doppler-derived parameters [E/e', E/(e' × s')] and left ventricular and right ventricular longitudinal strains in HFrEF (n = 340) and HFpEF (n = 102). Left ventricular and right ventricular longitudinal strains were significantly higher and E/(e' × s') was lower in patients with HFpEF compared with those with HFrEF, whereas E/e' was similar between the groups. During a median follow-up of 342 days, MACE developed in 95 patients with HFrEF and 29 with HFpEF. The univariable analysis revealed similar echocardiographic predictors between the 2 groups, including E/e', E/(e' × s') and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. No 2-dimensional speckle tracking-derived parameter remained significant in multivariable models in each HF group. E/(e' × s') was an only independent predictor with an incremental prognostic value over the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score and was superior to the E/e' ratio in both HFrEF and HFpEF. In conclusion, despite differences in echocardiography-based cardiac function parameters between HFrEF and HFpEF, these HF phenotypes shared the same echocardiographic predictors of future MACE. E/(e' × s') was an only independent predictor for future cardiac events in both HF populations.
本研究的目的是调查射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)是否具有相同的超声心动图预测指标,并阐明E/(e'×s')在每个心力衰竭组中独立于其他超声心动图参数预测主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的情况。我们评估了HFrEF组(n = 340)和HFpEF组(n = 102)中组织多普勒衍生参数[E/e',E/(e'×s')]以及左心室和右心室纵向应变。与HFrEF患者相比,HFpEF患者的左心室和右心室纵向应变显著更高,而E/(e'×s')更低,而两组之间的E/e'相似。在342天的中位随访期间,95例HFrEF患者和29例HFpEF患者发生了MACE。单变量分析显示两组之间的超声心动图预测指标相似,包括E/e'、E/(e'×s')和肺动脉收缩压。在每个心力衰竭组的多变量模型中,没有二维斑点追踪衍生参数仍然具有显著性。E/(e'×s')是唯一具有独立预测价值的指标,其预后价值超过慢性心力衰竭荟萃分析全球组评分,并且在HFrEF和HFpEF中均优于E/e'比值。总之,尽管HFrEF和HFpEF在基于超声心动图的心脏功能参数方面存在差异,但这些心力衰竭表型具有相同的超声心动图预测未来MACE的指标。E/(e'×s')是两个心力衰竭人群未来心脏事件的唯一独立预测指标。