Al-Azary Hamad, Buchanan Lori
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):296-307. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0650-7.
Previous research suggests that metaphor comprehension is affected both by the concreteness of the topic and vehicle and their semantic neighbours (Kintsch, 2000; Xu, 2010). However, studies have yet to manipulate these 2 variables simultaneously. To that end, we composed novel metaphors manipulated on topic concreteness and semantic neighbourhood density (SND) of topic and vehicle. In Experiment 1, participants rated the metaphors on the suitability (e.g. sensibility) of their topic-vehicle pairings. Topic concreteness interacted with SND such that participants rated metaphors from sparse semantic spaces to be more sensible than those from dense semantic spaces and preferred abstract topics over concrete topics only for metaphors from dense semantic spaces. In Experiments 2 and 3, we used presentation deadlines and found that topic concreteness and SND affect the online processing stages associated with metaphor comprehension. We discuss how the results are aligned with established psycholinguistic models of metaphor comprehension.
先前的研究表明,隐喻理解受到主题和喻体的具体性及其语义邻域的影响(金茨克,2000;徐,2010)。然而,尚未有研究同时对这两个变量进行操控。为此,我们创作了一些新的隐喻,这些隐喻在主题具体性以及主题和喻体的语义邻域密度(SND)方面有所不同。在实验1中,参与者对隐喻的主题 - 喻体配对的适宜性(例如合理性)进行评分。主题具体性与语义邻域密度相互作用,结果表明,参与者认为来自语义空间稀疏的隐喻比来自语义空间密集的隐喻更合理,并且只有对于来自语义空间密集的隐喻,他们才更倾向于抽象主题而非具体主题。在实验2和实验3中,我们设定了呈现期限,结果发现主题具体性和语义邻域密度会影响与隐喻理解相关的在线处理阶段。我们讨论了这些结果如何与已有的隐喻理解心理语言学模型相契合。