• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于动词的隐喻句理解的难度和愉悦感:一项行为研究。

Difficulty and pleasure in the comprehension of verb-based metaphor sentences: A behavioral study.

机构信息

School of Literatures, Languages and Cultures, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0263781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263781. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0263781
PMID:35148355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8836342/
Abstract

What is difficult is not usually pleasurable. Yet, for certain unfamiliar figurative language, like that which is common in poetry, while comprehension is often more difficult than for more conventional language, it is in many cases more pleasurable. Concentrating our investigation on verb-based metaphors, we examined whether and to what degree the novel variations (in the form of verb changes and extensions) of conventional verb metaphors were both more difficult to comprehend and yet induced more pleasure. To test this relationship, we developed a set of 62 familiar metaphor stimuli, each with corresponding optimal and excessive verb variation and metaphor extension conditions, and normed these stimuli using both objective measures and participant subjective ratings. We then tested the pleasure-difficulty relationship with an online behavioral study. Based on Rachel Giora and her colleagues' 'optimal innovation hypothesis', we anticipated an inverse U-shaped relationship between ease and pleasure, with an optimal degree of difficulty, introduced by metaphor variations, producing the highest degree of pleasure when compared to familiar or excessive conditions. Results, however, revealed a more complex picture, with only metaphor extension conditions (not verb variation conditions) producing the anticipated pleasure effects. Individual differences in semantic cognition and verbal reasoning assessed using the Semantic Similarities Test, while clearly influential, further complicated the pleasure-difficulty relationship, suggesting an important avenue for further investigation.

摘要

困难的事情通常并不愉快。然而,对于某些不熟悉的比喻语言,例如诗歌中常见的语言,虽然理解起来通常比传统语言更困难,但在许多情况下却更令人愉快。我们专注于基于动词的隐喻的研究,考察了常规动词隐喻的新颖变化(动词变化和扩展的形式)是否以及在多大程度上更难以理解,但又能带来更多的愉悦。为了检验这种关系,我们开发了一组 62 个熟悉的隐喻刺激,每个刺激都有相应的最佳和过度的动词变化和隐喻扩展条件,并使用客观测量和参与者主观评价对这些刺激进行了规范。然后,我们通过在线行为研究测试了愉悦与难度之间的关系。根据 Rachel Giora 和她的同事的“最佳创新假设”,我们预计在轻松和愉悦之间存在倒 U 形关系,隐喻变化引入的最佳难度与熟悉或过度条件相比,会产生最高程度的愉悦。然而,结果揭示了一幅更加复杂的画面,只有隐喻扩展条件(而非动词变化条件)产生了预期的愉悦效应。使用语义相似性测试评估的语义认知和言语推理的个体差异虽然明显有影响,但进一步复杂化了愉悦与难度的关系,这表明需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/7dc1ff018f12/pone.0263781.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/31c62902969a/pone.0263781.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/38ff661109af/pone.0263781.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/7dc1ff018f12/pone.0263781.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/31c62902969a/pone.0263781.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/38ff661109af/pone.0263781.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd8/8836342/7dc1ff018f12/pone.0263781.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Difficulty and pleasure in the comprehension of verb-based metaphor sentences: A behavioral study.基于动词的隐喻句理解的难度和愉悦感:一项行为研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0263781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263781. eCollection 2022.
2
Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty.隐喻加工的神经关联:形象性、熟悉度和难度的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):375-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
3
Verb Metaphoric Extension Under Semantic Strain.动词隐喻扩展在语义压力下。
Cogn Sci. 2022 May;46(5):e13141. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13141.
4
The Embodied Effect in the Comprehension of Chinese Action-Verb Metaphors.汉语动作动词隐喻理解中的具身效应。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Jun 24;53(4):54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10094-5.
5
Is the Processing of Chinese Verbal Metaphors Simulated or Abstracted? Evidence From an ERP Study.中文言语隐喻的加工是模拟的还是抽象的?来自一项ERP研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 13;13:877997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877997. eCollection 2022.
6
Differences in task demands influence the hemispheric lateralization and neural correlates of metaphor.任务要求的差异会影响隐喻的半球侧化和神经关联。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
7
Metaphor interpretation and use: a window into semantics in schizophrenia.隐喻的理解与运用:精神分裂症语义学之窗。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Dec;133(1-3):205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
8
From action to abstraction: The sensorimotor grounding of metaphor in Parkinson's disease.从动作到抽象:帕金森病中隐喻的感觉运动基础。
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:362-384. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
9
Kill the song—steal the show: what does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms?毙了那首歌——抢了风头:究竟是什么将谓语性隐喻与可分解习语区分开来?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2011 Jun;40(3):205-23. doi: 10.1007/s10936-010-9165-8.
10
Novel metaphor comprehension: Semantic neighbourhood density interacts with concreteness.新颖隐喻理解:语义邻域密度与具体性相互作用。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):296-307. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0650-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing.隐喻鲨鱼会咬人吗?隐喻加工中的模拟与抽象。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):557-570. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01109-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence.隐喻理解:理论与证据的批判性回顾。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):641-671. doi: 10.1037/bul0000145. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool.测量审美情绪:文献综述与一种新的评估工具
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178899. eCollection 2017.
4
Novel metaphor comprehension: Semantic neighbourhood density interacts with concreteness.新颖隐喻理解:语义邻域密度与具体性相互作用。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):296-307. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0650-7.
5
The Visual Aesthetics of Snowflakes.雪花的视觉美学。
Perception. 2016 Nov;45(11):1304-1319. doi: 10.1177/2041669516661122. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Perceived beauty of random texture patterns: A preference for complexity.随机纹理图案的感知美感:对复杂性的偏好。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jul;168:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Familiarity differentially affects right hemisphere contributions to processing metaphors and literals.熟悉度会对右半球处理隐喻和字面意义的方式产生差异影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 10;9:44. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00044. eCollection 2015.
8
Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor.刺激设计是一个障碍课程:560 对匹配的字面和隐喻句子,用于测试关于隐喻的神经假设。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):651-64. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.651.
9
The career of metaphor.隐喻的历程。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):193-216. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193.
10
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?处理流畅性与审美愉悦:美存在于感知者的处理体验中吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.