• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对舒克伦克和斯莫林所著《为何在自由民主国家医疗专业人员对依良心拒行无道德诉求权》的回应

Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling.

作者信息

Glick Shimon M, Jotkowitz Alan

机构信息

Jakobovits Center for Jewish Medical Ethics, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

BGU, Beersheva, Israel.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):248-249. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103670. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103670
PMID:27601600
Abstract

The recent essay by Schuklenk and Smalling opposing respect for physicians' conscientious objections to providing patients with medical services that are legally permitted in liberal democracies is based on several erroneous assumptions. Acting in this manner would have serious harmful effects on the ethos of medicine and of bioethics. A much more nuanced and balanced position is critical in order to respect physicians' conscience with minimal damage to patients' rights.

摘要

舒克莱恩克和斯莫林最近发表的反对尊重医生出于良心拒绝对在自由民主国家合法允许的为患者提供医疗服务的文章基于几个错误假设。以这种方式行事将对医学和生物伦理的风气产生严重有害影响。为了在对患者权利造成最小损害的情况下尊重医生的良知,一个更加细致入微和平衡的立场至关重要。

相似文献

1
Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling.对舒克伦克和斯莫林所著《为何在自由民主国家医疗专业人员对依良心拒行无道德诉求权》的回应
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):248-249. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103670. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
Response to: 'Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies' by Schuklenk and Smalling.对舒克莱恩克和斯莫林所著《为何在自由民主国家医疗专业人员对依良心拒服兵役 accommodation 没有道德诉求》的回应
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):250-252. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103643.
3
Two conceptions of conscience and the problem of conscientious objection.良心的两种概念与良心拒服兵役问题。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):245-247. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103702. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
4
Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies.为何在自由民主国家,医疗专业人员在依良心拒服(医疗职责)方面没有道德上的权利要求得到迁就。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):234-240. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103560. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals.轻视良知:对舒克莱恩克和斯莫林关于医学专业人员出于良心拒医观点的回应
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):241-244. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103903. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
[Conscientious objection in the clinical setting. A proposal for its appropriate use].[临床环境中的良心拒斥。关于其合理使用的提议]
Rev Calid Asist. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 May 2.
7
A Defence of Conscientious Objection in Medicine: A Reply to Schuklenk and Savulescu.医学中出于良心拒服兵役的辩护:对舒克莱恩克和萨武列斯库的回应
Bioethics. 2016 Jun;30(5):358-64. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12233. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Toward accommodating physicians' conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure.关于接纳医生的良心反对意见:支持公开披露的一个论点。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Mar;41(3):224-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101731. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
The paradox of conscientious objection and the anemic concept of 'conscience': downplaying the role of moral integrity in health care.良心拒服兵役的悖论与苍白的“良心”概念:淡化道德操守在医疗保健中的作用。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun;24(2):159-85. doi: 10.1353/ken.2014.0011.
10
How to Allow Conscientious Objection in Medicine While Protecting Patient Rights.如何在医学领域允许良心拒服从而保护患者权利。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):120-131. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000694.