Lyus Richard John
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):250-252. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103643.
Bioethicists commenting on conscientious objection and abortion should consider the empirical data on abortion providers. Abortion providers do not fall neatly into groups of providers and objectors, and ambivalence is a key theme in their experience. Practical details of abortion services further upset the dichotomy. These empirical facts are important because they demonstrate that the way the issue is described in analytical bioethics does not reflect reality. Addressing conscientious objection as a barrier to patient access requires engaging with those who provide the service and those who are able to but do not. The experiences of doctors facing these decisions potentially challenge and expand our understanding of the issue as an ethical concern.
评论出于良心拒医和堕胎问题的生物伦理学家应考虑有关堕胎服务提供者的实证数据。堕胎服务提供者并非简单地分为支持和反对堕胎的两类,矛盾心理是他们经历中的一个关键主题。堕胎服务的实际细节进一步打破了这种二分法。这些实证事实很重要,因为它们表明分析性生物伦理学中对该问题的描述方式并不反映现实。将出于良心拒医视为患者获得服务的障碍来处理,需要与提供服务的人和有能力提供但未提供服务的人进行接触。面临这些决策的医生的经历可能会挑战并扩展我们对这一问题作为伦理关切的理解。