Wood P P, Goodwin J E, Cleather D J
School of Sport, Health & Applied Science, St Mary's University, Twickenham, UK.
Biol Sport. 2016 Sep;33(3):257-61. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1201912. Epub 2016 May 12.
Progressive wave loading strategies are common within strength and conditioning practice. The purpose of this study was to contribute to the understanding of this strategy by evaluating the effectiveness of 2 wave loading bench press training programmes that differed only in the initial load that was used to start the first wave. Thirty-four resistance-trained men were divided into 2 groups and performed 2 training sessions each week for 20 weeks. One session consisted of 6 sets of 2 repetitions, while the other consisted of 5 sets of 5 repetitions. The load used was incremented by 2.5% of one repetition maximum (1RM) each week until the subject could no longer complete the programmed repetitions. At this point, the load was decreased, and then started to ascend again. The initial loads for the 2 sessions were 87.5% and 80% 1RM respectively for the heavier group, and for the lighter group were 82.5% and 75% 1RM. The subjects experienced a significant improvement in their bench press performance (higher load group: pre test = 106.5 kg ± 14.6, post test = 112.2 kg ± 12.4, p ≤ 0.05; lower load group: pre test = 105.7 kg ± 14.1, post test = 114.3 kg ± 11.0, p ≤ 0.05), but there was no difference in the magnitude of the improvment between the two groups. These results tend to support the common practical recommendation to start with a lighter load when employing a progressive wave loading strategy, as such a strategy yields similar improvements in performance with a lower level of exertion in training.
渐进式波浪负荷训练策略在力量与体能训练实践中很常见。本研究的目的是通过评估两个仅在起始第一波所用初始负荷上有所不同的波浪负荷卧推训练计划的有效性,来增进对该策略的理解。34名有阻力训练经验的男性被分为两组,每周进行两次训练,共20周。其中一组由6组每组2次重复组成,另一组由5组每组5次重复组成。每周使用的负荷以一次重复最大值(1RM)的2.5%递增,直到受试者无法完成规定的重复次数。此时,负荷降低,然后再次开始递增。较重组的两次训练的初始负荷分别为87.5%和80% 1RM,较轻组的初始负荷分别为82.5%和75% 1RM。受试者的卧推表现有显著改善(较高负荷组:预测试 = 106.5千克±14.6,后测试 = 112.2千克±12.4,p≤0.05;较低负荷组:预测试 = 105.7千克±14.1,后测试 = 114.3千克±11.0,p≤0.05),但两组之间的改善幅度没有差异。这些结果倾向于支持在采用渐进式波浪负荷训练策略时从较轻负荷开始的常见实际建议,因为这样的策略在训练中以较低的努力程度就能产生类似的表现提升。