• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自主调节式渐进抗阻训练与线性周期训练对大学生运动员力量提升的效果比较。

The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes.

机构信息

Department of Athletic Performance, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1718-23. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181def4a6.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181def4a6
PMID:20543732
Abstract

Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise (APRE) is a method by which athletes increase strength by progressing at their own pace based on daily and weekly variations in performance, unlike traditional linear periodization (LP), where there is a set increase in intensity from week to week. This study examined whether 6 weeks of APRE was more effective at improving strength compared with traditional LP in division I College football players. We compared 23 division 1 collegiate football players (2.65 +/- 0.8 training years) who were trained using either APRE (n = 12) or LP (n = 11) during 6 weeks of preseason training in 2 separate years. After 6 weeks of training, improvements in total bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM), squat 1RM, and repeated 225-lb bench press repetitions were compared between the APRE and LP protocol groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to determine differences between groups. Statistical significance was accepted at p < or = 0.05. Autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise demonstrated greater improvement in 1RM bench press strength (APRE: 93.4 +/- 103 N vs. LP: -0.40 +/- 49.6 N; ANCOVA: F = 7.1, p = 0.02), estimated 1RM squat strength (APRE: 192.7 +/- 199 N vs. LP: 37.2 +/- 155 N; ANOVA: F = 4.1, p = 0.05) and the number of repetitions performed at a weight of 225 lb (APRE: 3.17 +/- 2.86 vs. LP: -0.09 +/- 2.40 repetitions; ANCOVA: F = 6.8, p = 0.02) compared with the LP group over the 6-week training period. Our findings indicate that the APRE was more effective than the LP means of programming in increasing the bench press and squat over a period of 6 weeks.

摘要

自主递增抗阻训练(APRE)是一种根据日常和每周表现的变化,让运动员按照自己的节奏提高力量的方法,与传统的线性周期化(LP)不同,LP 是每周强度有一个固定的增加。本研究旨在比较 6 周 APRE 与传统 LP 在 I 级大学橄榄球运动员中提高力量的效果。我们比较了 2 个使用 APRE(n = 12)或 LP(n = 11)进行训练的 I 级大学橄榄球运动员(2.65 +/- 0.8 年训练年限),他们在 2 个不同年份的赛季前训练中进行了 6 周的训练。在 6 周的训练后,比较了 APRE 和 LP 方案组在总卧推 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)、深蹲 1RM 和重复 225 磅卧推次数方面的改善情况。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和协方差分析(ANCOVA)来确定组间差异。接受 p < or = 0.05 的统计学显著性。自主递增抗阻训练在 1RM 卧推力量方面显示出更大的改善(APRE:93.4 +/- 103 N 比 LP:-0.40 +/- 49.6 N;ANCOVA:F = 7.1,p = 0.02),估计的 1RM 深蹲力量(APRE:192.7 +/- 199 N 比 LP:37.2 +/- 155 N;ANOVA:F = 4.1,p = 0.05)和 225 磅重量的重复次数(APRE:3.17 +/- 2.86 比 LP:-0.09 +/- 2.40 次重复;ANCOVA:F = 6.8,p = 0.02)比 LP 组在 6 周的训练期间都有更大的提高。我们的研究结果表明,与 LP 相比,APRE 在 6 周的时间内更有效地增加了卧推和深蹲的力量。

相似文献

1
The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes.自主调节式渐进抗阻训练与线性周期训练对大学生运动员力量提升的效果比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1718-23. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181def4a6.
2
Upper-body work capacity and 1RM prediction are unaltered by increasing muscular strength in college football players.上身工作能力和 1RM 预测不受大学足球运动员肌肉力量增加的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2477-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1ae5f.
3
Lower-body work capacity and one-repetition maximum squat prediction in college football players.大学生足球运动员下半身工作能力和一次重复最大深蹲预测。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):364-72. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225eee3.
4
Anthropometry increases 1 repetition maximum predictive ability of NFL-225 test for Division IA college football players.人体测量学提高了 NFL-225 测试对 NCAA 一级大学足球运动员 1 次重复最大预测能力。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jun;24(6):1429-39. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d682fa.
5
Comparison of resistance training progression models on maximal strength in sub-elite adolescent rugby union players.次精英青少年橄榄球联盟球员最大力量的阻力训练进展模型比较
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Feb;19(2):163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
6
Efficacy of the National Football League-225 Test to Track Changes in One Repetition Maximum Bench Press After Training in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division IA Football Players.美国国家橄榄球联盟-225测试对美国国家大学体育协会第一分区甲组橄榄球运动员训练后卧推一次最大重量变化的追踪效果。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):2997-3005. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000829.
7
Performance changes during a college playing career in NCAA division III football athletes.大学生橄榄球运动员在 NCAA 第三赛区比赛生涯中的表现变化。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2351-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821743df.
8
Strength changes during an in-season resistance-training program for football.足球赛季中抗阻训练计划期间的力量变化。
J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Feb;17(1):109-14. doi: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0109:scdais>2.0.co;2.
9
The effects of resistance training prioritization in NCAA Division I Football summer training.美国大学体育协会(NCAA)一级联盟橄榄球夏季训练中阻力训练优先级安排的效果
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182977e56.
10
The effects of a 7-week practical blood flow restriction program on well-trained collegiate athletes.一项为期7周的实用血流限制计划对训练有素的大学生运动员的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Aug;28(8):2270-80. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000385.

引用本文的文献

1
Autoregulated resistance training for maximal strength enhancement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.用于最大力量增强的自动调节阻力训练:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2025 Oct;23(4):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2025.07.006. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
2
Dileucine ingestion, but not leucine, increases lower body strength and performance following resistance training: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.摄入双亮氨酸而非亮氨酸,可增强抗阻训练后的下肢力量和表现:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0312997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312997. eCollection 2024.
3
The parkour tic-tac action versus the drop jump as part of complex training within the strength and conditioning programme of highly-trained youth basketball players.
作为高水平青少年篮球运动员力量与体能训练计划中复杂训练一部分的跑酷侧手翻动作与跳深对比。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0315013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315013. eCollection 2024.
4
Effects of Progressive and Velocity-Based Autoregulatory Resistance Training on Lower-Limb Movement Ability in Taekwondo Athletes.渐进式和基于速度的自动调节抗阻训练对跆拳道运动员下肢运动能力的影响
Sports Health. 2025 May-Jun;17(3):545-555. doi: 10.1177/19417381241262024. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
5
Autoregulation Does Not Provide Additional Benefits to a Mixed Session Periodized Resistance Training Program in Trained Men.自主调节在训练有素的男性混合周期阻力训练方案中不会提供额外的益处。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Sep 1;38(9):1535-1542. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004836. Epub 2024 May 30.
6
The Effect of Time-Equated Concurrent Training Programs in Resistance-Trained Men.时间等效的同步训练计划对力量训练男性的影响。
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):87-103. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185637. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Implementing Meta-Session Autoregulation Strategies for Exercise - A Scoping Review.实施运动的元会话自动调节策略——一项范围综述
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Mar 1;17(5):382-404. doi: 10.70252/DABQ1369. eCollection 2024.
8
Anabolic myokine responses and muscular performance following 8 weeks of autoregulated compared to linear resistance exercise in recreationally active males.与线性阻力训练相比,休闲活动男性进行8周自动调节阻力训练后的合成代谢肌因子反应和肌肉表现。
Hormones (Athens). 2024 Sep;23(3):487-496. doi: 10.1007/s42000-024-00544-z. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
9
The enhancement of explosive power contributes to the development of anaerobic capacity: A comparison of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise and velocity-based resistance training.爆发力的增强有助于无氧能力的发展:自动调节渐进性抗阻训练与基于速度的抗阻训练的比较。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2024 Apr;22(2):159-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
10
Comparing autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise and velocity-based resistance training on jump performance in college badminton athletes.比较自主调节式渐进抗阻训练和基于速度的抗阻训练对大学生羽毛球运动员跳跃表现的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 7;11:e15877. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15877. eCollection 2023.