Suppr超能文献

认知判断偏差与雄性大鼠基于风险的决策及对多巴胺能挑战的敏感性相互作用。

Cognitive Judgment Bias Interacts with Risk Based Decision Making and Sensitivity to Dopaminergic Challenge in Male Rats.

作者信息

Drozd Robert, Cieslak Przemyslaw E, Rychlik Michal, Rodriguez Parkitna Jan, Rygula Rafal

机构信息

Affective Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Drug Development, Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow, Poland.

Laboratory of Transgenic Models, Department of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug 23;10:163. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00163. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Although the cognitive theory has implicated judgment bias in various psychopathologies, its role in decision making under risk remains relatively unexplored. In the present study, we assessed the effects of cognitive judgment bias on risky choices in rats. First, we trained and tested the animals on the rat version of the probability-discounting (PD) task. During discrete trials, the rats chose between two levers; a press on the "small/certain" lever always resulted in the delivery of one reward pellet, whereas a press on the "large/risky" lever resulted in the delivery of four pellets. However, the probability of receiving a reward from the "large/risky" lever gradually decreased over the four trial blocks. Subsequently, the rats were re-trained and evaluated on a series of ambiguous-cue interpretation (ACI) tests, which permitted their classification according to the display of "optimistic" or "pessimistic" traits. Because dopamine (DA) has been implicated in both: risky choices and optimism, in the last experiment, we compared the reactivity of the dopaminergic system in the "optimistic" and "pessimistic" animals using the apomorphine (APO; 2 mg/kg s.c.) sensitivity test. We demonstrated that as risk increased, the proportion of risky lever choices decreased significantly slower in "optimists" compared with "pessimists" and that these differences between the two groups of rats were associated with different levels of dopaminergic system reactivity. Our findings suggest that cognitive judgment bias, risky decision-making and DA are linked, and they provide a foundation for further investigation of the behavioral traits and cognitive processes that influence risky choices in animal models.

摘要

尽管认知理论已表明判断偏差与多种精神病理学有关,但其在风险决策中的作用仍相对未被探索。在本研究中,我们评估了认知判断偏差对大鼠风险选择的影响。首先,我们在大鼠版概率折扣(PD)任务上对动物进行训练和测试。在离散试验中,大鼠在两个杠杆之间做出选择;按下“小/确定”杠杆总会获得一粒奖励颗粒,而按下“大/风险”杠杆则会获得四粒颗粒。然而,从“大/风险”杠杆获得奖励的概率在四个试验块中逐渐降低。随后,对大鼠进行重新训练,并在一系列模糊线索解释(ACI)测试中进行评估,这些测试允许根据“乐观”或“悲观”特征的表现对它们进行分类。由于多巴胺(DA)与风险选择和乐观情绪都有关,在最后一个实验中,我们使用阿扑吗啡(APO;2mg/kg皮下注射)敏感性测试比较了“乐观”和“悲观”动物中多巴胺能系统的反应性。我们证明,随着风险增加,与“悲观者”相比,“乐观者”选择风险杠杆的比例显著下降得更慢,并且两组大鼠之间的这些差异与多巴胺能系统反应性的不同水平相关。我们的研究结果表明,认知判断偏差、风险决策和多巴胺是相互关联的,它们为进一步研究影响动物模型中风险选择的行为特征和认知过程奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c6a/4993790/dc9a2e5b5eea/fnbeh-10-00163-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验