Affective Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Drug Development, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smetna Street, 31-343, Krakow, Poland.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):516-26. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0410-y.
Several cognitive theories of depression have proposed that cognitive judgment bias determines individual vulnerability to this disorder. Indeed, we have recently demonstrated a relationship between pessimistic judgment bias and vulnerability of rats to the stress-induced anhedonia, and a negative correlation between the level of pessimism and motivation. To further characterize the effects of trait pessimism on cognitive processes associated with depression, in the present study we compared the sensitivity of rats displaying optimistic and pessimistic traits to positive and negative feedback. The animals were initially trained and tested in the rat version of the probabilistic reversal-learning (PRL) task, which allowed for the assessment of feedback sensitivity in individual animals. Subsequently, the rats were re-trained and tested in a series of ambiguous-cue interpretation (ACI) tests, which allowed for the classification of animals displaying "optimistic" and "pessimistic" traits. The "pessimistic" rats were significantly more sensitive to negative feedback than their "optimistic" conspecifics, as indicated by an increased proportion of lose-shift behaviors. The results of our study demonstrate the interrelation and co-existence of two cognitive biases that may predict vulnerability to depressive disorder.
几种抑郁的认知理论提出,认知判断偏差决定了个体易患这种疾病的倾向。事实上,我们最近已经证明了悲观的判断偏差与大鼠对压力引起的快感缺失的易感性之间存在关系,以及悲观程度与动机之间的负相关。为了进一步描述特质悲观主义对与抑郁相关的认知过程的影响,在本研究中,我们比较了表现出乐观和悲观特质的大鼠对正反馈和负反馈的敏感性。这些动物最初在大鼠概率反转学习(PRL)任务的版本中接受训练和测试,该任务允许评估个体动物对反馈的敏感性。随后,对这些大鼠进行了一系列的模糊线索解释(ACI)测试,这允许对表现出“乐观”和“悲观”特质的动物进行分类。与“乐观”的同物种相比,“悲观”的大鼠对负反馈更为敏感,这表现为转换行为的比例增加。我们的研究结果表明,两种认知偏差相互关联并共存,这可能预示着易患抑郁障碍。