Robinson Robert
Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine , Springfield, IL , USA.
PeerJ. 2016 Aug 11;4:e2343. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2343. eCollection 2016.
The educational technology of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has been successfully applied in a wide variety of disciplines and are an intense focus of educational research at this time. Educators are now looking to MOOC technology as a means to improve professional medical education, but very little is known about how medical MOOCs compare with traditional content delivery.
A retrospective analysis of the course evaluations for the Medicine as a Business elective by fourth-year medical students at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIU-SOM) for the 2012-2015 academic years was conducted. This course was delivered by small group flipped classroom discussions for 2012-2014 and delivered via MOOC technology in 2015. Learner ratings were compared between the two course delivery methods using routinely collected course evaluations.
Course enrollment has ranged from 6-19 students per year in the 2012-2015 academic years. Student evaluations of the course are favorable in the areas of effective teaching, accurate course objectives, meeting personal learning objectives, recommending the course to other students, and overall when rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The majority of all student ratings (76-95%) of this elective course are for the highest possible choice (Strongly agree or Excellent) for any criteria, regardless if the course was delivered via a traditional or MOOC format. Statistical analysis of these ratings suggests that the Effective Teacher and Overall Evaluations did not statistically differ between the two delivery formats.
Student ratings of this elective course were highly similar when delivered in a flipped classroom format or by using MOOC technology. The primary advantage of this new course format is flexibility of time and place for learners, allowing them to complete the course objectives when convenient for them. The course evaluations suggest this is a change that is acceptable to the target audience.
This study suggests that learner evaluations of a fourth-year medical school elective course do not significantly differ when delivered by flipped classroom group discussions or via MOOC technology in a very small single center observational study. Further investigation is required to determine if this delivery method is an acceptable and effective means of teaching in the medical school environment.
大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)的教育技术已成功应用于广泛的学科领域,并且是当前教育研究的一个热点。教育工作者现在期望将MOOC技术作为改善专业医学教育的一种手段,但对于医学MOOC与传统教学内容传递方式相比情况如何,人们了解甚少。
对南伊利诺伊大学医学院(SIU - SOM)2012 - 2015学年四年级医学生对“医学作为一门生意”选修课程的课程评价进行回顾性分析。该课程在2012 - 2014年通过小组翻转课堂讨论授课,2015年通过MOOC技术授课。使用常规收集的课程评价比较两种课程授课方式下的学习者评分。
在2012 - 2015学年,每年的课程注册人数在6 - 19名学生之间。学生对该课程在有效教学、准确的课程目标、实现个人学习目标、向其他学生推荐该课程以及总体方面(采用5分李克特量表评分)的评价良好。对于这门选修课程,无论课程是通过传统方式还是MOOC形式授课,所有学生评分中的大多数(76 - 95%)在任何标准下都选择了最高可能选项(强烈同意或优秀)。对这些评分的统计分析表明,两种授课形式在有效教师和总体评价方面在统计学上没有差异。
当以翻转课堂形式或使用MOOC技术授课时,该选修课程的学生评分高度相似。这种新课程形式的主要优势在于为学习者提供了时间和地点的灵活性,使他们能够在方便的时候完成课程目标。课程评价表明这是目标受众可以接受的一种变化。
在一项非常小的单中心观察性研究中,本研究表明,医学院四年级选修课程通过翻转课堂小组讨论或MOOC技术授课时,学习者评价没有显著差异。需要进一步调查以确定这种授课方式在医学院环境中是否是一种可接受且有效的教学手段。