Wolever T M, Csima A, Jenkins D J, Wong G S, Josse R G
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Nutr. 1989 Jun;8(3):235-47. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1989.10720298.
It is not known whether the variability of the glycemic index (GI) in different subjects is due to within- or between-individual variation. In addition, it is not known how large a difference in GI between different meals is clinically important for individuals with diabetes. Therefore, insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) diabetic subjects tested four foods, with each food taken by each subject on two separate occasions. For each food, most of the variation of absolute glycemic responses was due to differences between the subjects. However, when the results were expressed as the GI, there were no significant differences between the subjects, and most of the variation was due to within-individual variation. Using the within-individual variance, we estimated the so-called "predictive difference" of GI values. Its reliability was assessed by consideration of published data from eight studies where different mixed meals were taken by the same group of subjects. There were 37 cases where the difference between the GI of any two meals was greater than the predictive difference. Of these 37 pairs of meals, the GI correctly ranked the glycemic responses in 36 (97%). We conclude that GI values for the same food do not vary significantly between different individuals. For a subject with NIDDM a difference in GI of 34 will predict the ranking of glycemic responses of two meals with 95% probability. The corresponding value for a subject with IDDM is 50.
目前尚不清楚不同个体之间血糖指数(GI)的变异性是由于个体内部还是个体之间的差异。此外,对于糖尿病患者而言,不同餐食之间的GI差异达到多大在临床上具有重要意义也尚不清楚。因此,胰岛素依赖型(IDDM)和非胰岛素依赖型(NIDDM)糖尿病患者对四种食物进行了测试,每种食物由每位受试者在两个不同的场合食用。对于每种食物,绝对血糖反应的大部分变异是由于受试者之间的差异。然而,当结果以GI表示时,受试者之间没有显著差异,且大部分变异是由于个体内部的差异。利用个体内部方差,我们估计了GI值的所谓“预测差异”。通过考虑来自八项研究的已发表数据评估了其可靠性,在这些研究中同一组受试者食用了不同的混合餐食。有37例情况中任意两餐的GI差异大于预测差异。在这37对餐食中,GI正确地对血糖反应进行了排名,其中36对(97%)排名正确。我们得出结论,同一食物的GI值在不同个体之间没有显著差异。对于NIDDM患者,GI差异为34时将以95%的概率预测两餐血糖反应的排名。IDDM患者的相应值为50。