Hodgson Christopher J, Oliver David M, Fish Robert D, Bulmer Nicholas M, Heathwaite A Louise, Winter Michael, Chadwick David R
Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 2SB, UK.
Biological & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183:325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.047. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
Dairy farming generates large volumes of liquid manure (slurry), which is ultimately recycled to agricultural land as a valuable source of plant nutrients. Different methods of slurry application to land exist; some spread the slurry to the sward surface whereas others deliver the slurry under the sward and into the soil, thus helping to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of two slurry application methods (surface broadcast versus shallow injection) on the survival of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) delivered via dairy slurry to replicated grassland plots across contrasting seasons. A significant increase in FIO persistence (measured by the half-life of E. coli and intestinal enterococci) was observed when slurry was applied to grassland via shallow injection, and FIO decay rates were significantly higher for FIOs applied to grassland in spring relative to summer and autumn. Significant differences in the behaviour of E. coli and intestinal enterococci over time were also observed, with E. coli half-lives influenced more strongly by season of application relative to the intestinal enterococci population. While shallow injection of slurry can reduce agricultural GHG emissions to air it can also prolong the persistence of FIOs in soil, potentially increasing the risk of their subsequent transfer to water. Awareness of (and evidence for) the potential for 'pollution-swapping' is critical in order to guard against unintended environmental impacts of agricultural management decisions.
奶牛养殖产生大量的液体粪便(粪肥),这些粪肥最终作为宝贵的植物养分来源被回用于农田。存在不同的粪肥施用到土地的方法;一些是将粪肥撒播到草地表面,而另一些则是将粪肥施用到草皮下并进入土壤,从而有助于减少农业中的温室气体排放。本研究的目的是调查两种粪肥施用方法(表面撒播与浅埋注入)对通过奶牛粪肥输送到不同季节的重复草地地块的粪便指示生物(FIOs)存活的影响。当通过浅埋注入将粪肥施用到草地时,观察到FIOs的持久性显著增加(通过大肠杆菌和肠道肠球菌的半衰期来衡量),并且相对于夏季和秋季,春季施用到草地的FIOs的衰减率显著更高。还观察到大肠杆菌和肠道肠球菌随时间的行为存在显著差异,相对于肠道肠球菌群体,大肠杆菌的半衰期受施用季节的影响更强。虽然浅埋注入粪肥可以减少农业向空气中的温室气体排放,但它也会延长FIOs在土壤中的持久性,可能增加它们随后转移到水体的风险。了解(并提供证据证明)“污染转移”的可能性对于防范农业管理决策产生的意外环境影响至关重要。