Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jan;79(2):535-42. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02506-12. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
Pathogens may reach agricultural soils through application of animal manure and thereby pose a risk of contaminating crops as well as surface and groundwater. Treatment and handling of manure for improved nutrient and odor management may also influence the amount and fate of manure-borne pathogens in the soil. A study was conducted to investigate the leaching potentials of a phage (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bacteriophage 28B) and two bacteria, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus species, in a liquid fraction of raw pig slurry obtained by solid-liquid separation of this slurry and in this liquid fraction after ozonation, when applied to intact soil columns by subsurface injection. We also compared leaching potentials of surface-applied and subsurface-injected raw slurry. The columns were exposed to irrigation events (3.5-h period at 10 mm h(-1)) after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of incubation with collection of leachate. By the end of incubation, the distribution and survival of microorganisms in the soil of each treatment and in nonirrigated columns with injected raw slurry or liquid fraction were determined. E. coli in the leachates was quantified by both plate counts and quantitative PCR (qPCR) to assess the proportions of culturable and nonculturable (viable and nonviable) cells. Solid-liquid separation of slurry increased the redistribution in soil of contaminants in the liquid fraction compared to raw slurry, and the percent recovery of E. coli and Enterococcus species was higher for the liquid fraction than for raw slurry after the four leaching events. The liquid fraction also resulted in more leaching of all contaminants except Enterococcus species than did raw slurry. Ozonation reduced E. coli leaching only. Injection enhanced the leaching potential of the microorganisms investigated compared to surface application, probably because of a better survival with subsurface injection and a shorter leaching path.
病原体可能通过施用动物粪便进入农业土壤,从而污染作物以及地表水和地下水。为改善养分和气味管理而对粪便进行处理和处置,也可能影响土壤中粪源病原体的数量和归宿。本研究旨在调查噬菌体(肠炎沙门氏菌噬菌体 28B)和两种细菌(大肠杆菌和肠球菌属)在固液分离后的生猪粪浆液体部分,以及经臭氧处理后的该液体部分,通过地下注射施用于完整土柱时的淋滤潜力。我们还比较了生浆的表面施用和地下注射的淋滤潜力。在接种后 1、2、3 和 4 周进行灌溉事件(10mm/h 持续 3.5h),并收集淋出液。到培养结束时,测定了每个处理以及注射生浆或液体部分的非灌溉土柱中土壤中微生物的分布和存活情况。通过平板计数和定量 PCR(qPCR)定量测定淋出液中的大肠杆菌,以评估可培养和不可培养(存活和非存活)细胞的比例。与生浆相比,浆体的固液分离增加了液体部分中污染物在土壤中的再分布,并且在四次淋滤事件后,液体部分中大肠杆菌和肠球菌属的回收率高于生浆。液体部分也导致除肠球菌属以外的所有污染物的淋滤量均多于生浆。臭氧处理仅减少了大肠杆菌的淋滤。与表面施用相比,注射增强了所研究微生物的淋滤潜力,这可能是因为地下注射的微生物存活更好,淋滤路径更短。