Shillingsburg M Alice, Gayman Cassondra M, Walton William
Emory University School of Medicine, 1920 Briarcliff Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA ; Marcus Autism Center, 1920 Briarclif Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Apr 29;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40616-016-0053-7. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Recent research on teaching mands for information to children with language deficits has focused on manipulating establishing operations (EOs). However, only a few of those studies have programmed both EO conditions (in which information is needed) and abolishing operation (AO) conditions (in which information has already been provided) to ensure functional use of the mand for information. Shillingsburg, Bowen, Valentino, and Pierce (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 136-150, 2014) provided a successful demonstration of differential responding between EO and AO conditions demonstrating control of the response by the relevant EO. Echoic prompts resulted in successful mands for information "Who?" One limitation of this study was that the participants did not re-issue the initial mand upon approaching the named adult to retrieve the item. This may be problematic in the natural environment as it is unlikely that the named adult would know what the child was looking for. The current study sought to replicate and expand previous research by using textual prompts to teach the mand "Who?" in four children diagnosed with autism (Phase 1) and by requiring the mand for the item be re-issued upon approaching the named adult (Phase 2). Textual prompts resulted in differential use of the mand for information during EO and AO conditions for all of the participants. Additionally, three of the four participants who did not re-issue the mand to the named adult during the Phase 2 baseline did so following the intervention. Overall, results support the use of textual prompts to teach mands for information to children with autism.
近期针对向有语言缺陷的儿童教授询问信息的指令的研究,主要聚焦于操控建立操作(EOs)。然而,这些研究中只有少数设定了建立操作条件(即需要信息的情况)和废除操作(AO)条件(即信息已被提供的情况),以确保询问信息指令的功能性使用。希林斯堡、鲍恩、瓦伦蒂诺和皮尔斯(《应用行为分析杂志》,47卷,第136 - 150页,2014年)成功展示了在建立操作和废除操作条件下的差异反应,证明了相关建立操作对反应的控制。模仿性提示成功引出了询问信息的指令“谁?”。这项研究的一个局限性在于,参与者在接近被点名的成年人去取物品时,没有再次发出最初的指令。在自然环境中这可能会有问题,因为被点名的成年人不太可能知道孩子在找什么。当前的研究试图复制并扩展先前的研究,通过使用文字提示来教授“谁?”这个指令给四名被诊断为自闭症的儿童(第一阶段),并要求在接近被点名的成年人时再次发出索要物品的指令(第二阶段)。文字提示导致所有参与者在建立操作和废除操作条件下对询问信息的指令有差异地使用。此外,在第二阶段基线期没有向被点名的成年人再次发出指令的四名参与者中,有三名在干预后做到了这一点。总体而言,研究结果支持使用文字提示向自闭症儿童教授询问信息的指令。