Suppr超能文献

儿科基因检测与筛查中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening.

作者信息

Botkin Jeffrey R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016 Dec;28(6):700-704. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000418.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Developments in genetic test technologies enable a detailed analysis of the genomes of individuals across the range of human development from embryos to adults with increased precision and lower cost. These powerful technologies raise a number of ethical issues in pediatrics, primarily because of the frequent lack of clinical utility of genetic information, the generation of secondary results and questions over the proper scope of parental authority for testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several professional organizations in the fields of genetics and pediatrics have published new guidance on the ethical, legal, and policy issues relevant to genetic testing in children. The roles of predictive testing for adult-onset conditions, the management of secondary findings and the role of informed consent for newborn screening remain controversial. However, research and experience are not demonstrating serious adverse psychosocial impacts from genetic testing and screening in children. The use of these technologies is expanding with the notion that the personal utility of test results, rather than clinical utility, may be sufficient to justify testing.

SUMMARY

The use of microarray and genome sequencing technologies is expanding in the care of children. More deference to parental decision-making is evolving in contexts wherein information and counseling can be made readily available.

摘要

综述目的

基因检测技术的发展使得能够更精确且低成本地详细分析从胚胎到成人的全人类发育阶段个体的基因组。这些强大的技术在儿科学领域引发了一些伦理问题,主要是因为基因信息常常缺乏临床实用性、会产生次要结果以及关于检测中父母权威的适当范围存在疑问。

最新发现

遗传学和儿科学领域的几个专业组织已发布了关于儿童基因检测相关伦理、法律和政策问题的新指南。针对成人发病疾病的预测性检测的作用、次要结果的管理以及新生儿筛查知情同意的作用仍存在争议。然而,研究和经验并未表明基因检测和筛查对儿童有严重的不良心理社会影响。随着认为检测结果的个人效用而非临床效用可能足以证明检测合理性的观念,这些技术的使用正在扩大。

总结

微阵列和基因组测序技术在儿童护理中的应用正在扩大。在能够随时提供信息和咨询的情况下,对父母决策的更多尊重正在形成。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in pediatric genetic testing and screening.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016 Dec;28(6):700-704. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000418.
2
The new genetics and informed consent: differentiating choice to preserve autonomy.
Bioethics. 2013 Jul;27(6):348-55. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12030. Epub 2013 May 30.
3
Ethical issues in predictive pediatric genetic testing.
S C Nurse (1994). 2010 Oct-Dec;17(4):6-7.
4
Genetic testing in children.
Indian Pediatr. 2013 Sep;50(9):823-7. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0228-4.
5
Currents in contemporary ethics: the role of parents in expanded newborn screening.
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Winter;37(4):846-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00456.x.
7
Neonatal genetic testing is more than screening.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2008 Jun;20(2):233-7, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2008.01.005.
8
Genetic profiling of newborns: ethical and social issues.
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jan;7(1):67-71. doi: 10.1038/nrg1745.
10
From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul;34(6):639-47. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn075. Epub 2008 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

4
A content analysis of parents' reflections on pathogenic and uncertain pediatric oncology germline sequencing results.
Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov;23(4):551-561. doi: 10.1007/s10689-024-00417-9. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
5
Experts' Views on Children's Access to Community-Based Therapeutic and Education Services After Genomic Sequencing Results.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2024;45(5):e456-e462. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001299. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
7
A newborn Screening Programme for Inborn errors of metabolism in Galicia: 22 years of evaluation and follow-up.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 May 17;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03204-y.
10
Challenges of pediatric pharmacotherapy: A narrative review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Feb;80(2):203-221. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03598-x. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
"It wasn't a disaster or anything": Parents' experiences of their child's uncertain chromosomal microarray result.
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Nov;170(11):2895-2904. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37838. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory.
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Jun;44(2):231-40. doi: 10.1177/1073110516654133.
4
Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):298-304. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9871-3. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Newborn screening: evolving challenges in an era of rapid discovery.
JAMA. 2015 Apr 21;313(15):1511-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17488.
7
Lessons from the residual newborn screening dried blood sample litigation.
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring;43 Suppl 1:32-5. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12211.
8
Closing the gap between knowledge and clinical application: challenges for genomic translation.
PLoS Genet. 2015 Feb 26;11(2):e1004978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004978. eCollection 2015.
9
Genomic engineering and the future of medicine.
JAMA. 2015 Feb 24;313(8):791-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.287.
10
Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Genome Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):305-15. doi: 10.1101/gr.183483.114. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验