Tziner Aharon, Fein Erich C, Kim Se-Kang, Vasiliu Cristinel, Shkoler Or
Peres Academic Center, Rehovot, Israel.
Netanya Academic College, Netanya, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00851. eCollection 2020.
The need for better incorporation of the construct emotional intelligence (EI) into counterproductive work behavior (CWB) research may be achieved via a unified conceptual framework. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to use the Profile Analysis via Multidimensional Scaling (PAMS) approach, and a conceptual framework that unifies motivational process with antecedents and outcomes, to assess differences in EI concerning a variety of constructs: organizational justice, CWB, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Employing established scales within a framework unifying CWB, intrinsic motivation, EI, organizational justice, and outcome constructs, two EI-based profiles displayed associations with CWB based on responses from 3,293 employees. Both the first core profile, , and the second core profile, , displayed associations with interpersonal deviance and organizational deviance, as well as emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction. The results are discussed with respect to possible underlying theory and an overarching unified motivation framework that incorporates goal choice, intrinsic motivation, antecedents, and outcomes. We also provide directions for future research and implications for managers in the workplace based on heuristic conceptual frameworks that combine multiple motivational perspectives into a unified model.
通过一个统一的概念框架，或许能够更好地将情商（EI）这一概念纳入反生产工作行为（CWB）研究。因此，本文旨在运用多维尺度分析轮廓分析（PAMS）方法以及一个将动机过程与前因和结果统一起来的概念框架，来评估情商在各种构念方面的差异：组织公正、反生产工作行为、情绪耗竭、工作满意度和内在动机。在一个统一了反生产工作行为、内在动机、情商、组织公正和结果构念的框架内使用既定量表，基于3293名员工的回答，两个基于情商的轮廓显示出与反生产工作行为之间的关联。第一个核心轮廓和第二个核心轮廓都显示出与人际偏差和组织偏差以及情绪耗竭和工作满意度之间的关联。将根据可能的潜在理论以及一个包含目标选择、内在动机、前因和结果的总体统一动机框架来讨论研究结果。我们还基于启发式概念框架为未来研究提供方向，并为职场中的管理者提供启示，该框架将多种动机观点整合到一个统一模型中。
