Morishita Fukushi, Yadav Rajendra-Prasad, Eang Mao Tan, Saint Saly, Nishikiori Nobuyuki
World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines.
World Health Organization Representative Office in the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0162796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162796. eCollection 2016.
Despite free TB services available in public health facilities, TB patients often face severe financial burden due to TB. WHO set a new global target that no TB-affected families experience catastrophic costs due to TB. To monitor the progress and strategize the optimal approach to achieve the target, there is a great need to assess baseline cost data, explore potential proxy indicators for catastrophic costs, and understand what intervention mitigates financial burden. In Cambodia, nationwide active case finding (ACF) targeting household and neighbourhood contacts was implemented alongside routine passive case finding (PCF). We analyzed household cost data from ACF and PCF to determine the financial benefit of ACF, update the baseline cost data, and explore whether any dissaving patterns can be a proxy for catastrophic costs in Cambodia.
In this cross-sectional comparative study, structured interviews were carried out with 108 ACF patients and 100 PCF patients. Direct and indirect costs, costs before and during treatment, costs as percentage of annual household income and dissaving patterns were compared between the two groups.
The median total costs were lower by 17% in ACF than in PCF ($240.7 [IQR 65.5-594.6] vs $290.5 [IQR 113.6-813.4], p = 0.104). The median costs before treatment were significantly lower in ACF than in PCF ($5.1 [IQR 1.5-25.8] vs $22.4 [IQR 4.4-70.8], p<0.001). Indirect costs constituted the largest portion of total costs (72.3% in ACF and 61.5% in PCF). Total costs were equivalent to 11.3% and 18.6% of annual household income in ACF and PCF, respectively. ACF patients were less likely to dissave to afford TB-related expenses. Costs as percentage of annual household income were significantly associated with an occurrence of selling property (p = 0.02 for ACF, p = 0.005 for PCF).
TB-affected households face severe financial hardship in Cambodia. ACF has the great potential to mitigate the costs incurred particularly before treatment. Social protection schemes that can replace lost income are critically needed to compensate for the most devastating costs in TB. An occurrence of selling household property can be a useful proxy for catastrophic cost in Cambodia.
尽管公共卫生机构提供免费的结核病服务,但结核病患者往往因结核病面临沉重的经济负担。世界卫生组织设定了一个新的全球目标,即任何受结核病影响的家庭都不会因结核病而承受灾难性费用。为了监测进展情况并制定实现该目标的最佳方法,迫切需要评估基线成本数据,探索灾难性费用的潜在替代指标,并了解何种干预措施可减轻经济负担。在柬埔寨,针对家庭和邻里接触者的全国性主动病例发现(ACF)与常规被动病例发现(PCF)同时实施。我们分析了ACF和PCF的家庭成本数据,以确定ACF的经济收益,更新基线成本数据,并探讨在柬埔寨是否有任何储蓄减少模式可作为灾难性费用的替代指标。
在这项横断面比较研究中,对108名ACF患者和100名PCF患者进行了结构化访谈。比较了两组之间的直接和间接成本、治疗前和治疗期间的成本、成本占家庭年收入的百分比以及储蓄减少模式。
ACF的总费用中位数比PCF低17%(240.7美元[四分位间距65.5 - 594.6]对290.5美元[四分位间距113.6 - 813.4],p = 0.104)。ACF治疗前的成本中位数显著低于PCF(5.1美元[四分位间距1.5 - 25.8]对22.4美元[四分位间距4.4 - 70.8],p<0.001)。间接成本占总成本的比例最大(ACF为72.3%,PCF为61.5%)。ACF和PCF的总成本分别相当于家庭年收入的11.3%和18.6%。ACF患者为支付结核病相关费用而动用储蓄的可能性较小。成本占家庭年收入的百分比与出售房产的发生率显著相关(ACF中p = 0.02,PCF中p = 0.005)。
在柬埔寨,受结核病影响的家庭面临严重的经济困难。ACF有很大潜力减轻特别是治疗前产生的费用。迫切需要能够弥补收入损失的社会保护计划,以补偿结核病中最具破坏性的费用。出售家庭财产的情况可作为柬埔寨灾难性费用的有用替代指标。