Jain Snigdha, Khera Rohan, Girotra Saket, Badesch David, Wang Zhen, Murad Mohammad Hassan, Blevins Amy, Schmidt Gregory A, Singh Siddharth, Gerke Alicia K
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):90-105. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.08.1461. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to examine comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacologic interventions for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Register, EMBASE, CINAHL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched (January 1, 1990 to March 3, 2016). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the approved pharmacologic agents endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5i), the oral/inhaled (PO/INH) and IV/subcutaneous (SC) prostanoids, and riociguat and selexipag, alone or in combination, for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and reporting at least one efficacy outcome were selected.
Thirty-one RCTs with 6,565 patients were selected. In network meta-analysis, when compared with a median placebo rate of 14.5%, clinical worsening was estimated at 2.8% with riociguat (risk ratio [RR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.76); at 3.9% with ERA + PDE5i (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52), and at 5.7% with PDE5i (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.62). For improvement in functional status, when compared with 16.2% in the placebo group, improvement in at least one New York Heart Association/World Health Organization (NYHA/WHO) functional class was estimated at 81.8% with IV/SC prostanoids (RR, 5.06; 95% CI, 2.3211.04), at 28.3% with ERA + PDE5i (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.05-2.92), and at 25.2% with ERA (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.22-2.00). Differences in mortality were not significant. Adverse events leading to discontinuation of therapy were highest with the PO/INH prostanoids (RR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.68-5.06) and selexipag (RR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.04-3.88) compared with placebo.
Currently approved pharmacologic agents have varying effects on morbidity and functional status in patients with PAH. Future comparative effectiveness trials are warranted with a focus on a patient-centered approach to therapy.
PROSPERO CRD42016036803.
我们进行了一项系统评价和网状Meta分析,以研究肺动脉高压(PAH)药物干预的比较疗效和耐受性。
检索了MEDLINE、Cochrane注册库、EMBASE、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov(1990年1月1日至2016年3月3日)。选择了研究已批准的药物内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)、磷酸二酯酶抑制剂(PDE5i)、口服/吸入(PO/INH)和静脉/皮下(IV/SC)前列环素以及利奥西呱和司来帕格单独或联合用于肺动脉高压(PAH)并报告至少一项疗效结果的随机对照试验(RCT)。
选择了31项RCT,共6565例患者。在网状Meta分析中,与安慰剂组中位数14.5%相比,利奥西呱导致临床恶化的估计发生率为2.8%(风险比[RR],0.19;95%CI,0.05 - 0.76);ERA + PDE5i为3.9%(RR,0.27;95%CI,0.14 - 0.52),PDE5i为5.7%(RR,0.39;95%CI,0.24 - 0.62)。对于功能状态的改善,与安慰剂组的16.2%相比,IV/SC前列环素使至少一个纽约心脏协会/世界卫生组织(NYHA/WHO)功能分级得到改善的估计发生率为81.8%(RR,5.06;95%CI,2.32 - 11.04),ERA + PDE5i为28.3%(RR,1.75;95%CI,1.05 - 2.92),ERA为25.2%(RR,1.56;95%CI,1.22 - 2.00)。死亡率差异无统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,导致治疗中断的不良事件在PO/INH前列环素(RR,2.92;95%CI,1.68 - 5.06)和司来帕格(RR,2.06;95%CI,1.04 - 3.88)中最高。
目前批准的药物对PAH患者的发病率和功能状态有不同影响。未来有必要进行以患者为中心的治疗方法为重点的比较有效性试验。
PROSPERO CRD42016036803