Kim Nick H, Fisher Micah, Poch David, Zhao Carol, Shah Mehul, Bartolome Sonja
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Pulm Circ. 2020 Nov 25;10(4):2045894020935291. doi: 10.1177/2045894020935291. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
Limited data about the long-term prognosis and response to therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with World Health Organization functional class I/II symptoms are available. PubMed and Embase were searched for publications of observational registries and randomized, controlled trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients published between January 2001 and January 2018. Eligible registries enrolled pulmonary arterial hypertension patients ≥18 years, > 30, and reported survival by functional class. Randomized, controlled trial inclusion criteria were pulmonary arterial hypertension patients ≥18 years, ≥6 months of treatment, and morbidity, mortality, or time to worsening as end points reported by functional class. The primary outcomes were survival for registries and clinical event rates for randomized, controlled trials. Separate random effects models were calculated for registries and randomized, controlled trials. Four randomized, controlled trials ( = 2482) and 10 registries ( = 6580) were included. Registries enrolled 9%-47% functional class I/II patients (the vast majority being functional class II) with various pulmonary arterial hypertension etiologies. Survival rates for functional class I/II patients at one, two, and three years were 93% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91%-95%), 86% (95% CI: 82%-89%), and 78% (95% CI: 73%-83%), respectively. The hazard ratio for the treatment effect in randomized, controlled trials overall was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.74) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.44-0.82) for functional class I/II patients and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49-0.78) for functional class III/IV. The calculated risk of death of 22% within three years for functional class I/II patients underlines the need for careful assessment and optimal treatment of patients with functional class I/II disease. The randomized, controlled trial analysis demonstrates that current medical therapies have a beneficial treatment effect in this population.
关于世界卫生组织功能分级为I/II级症状的肺动脉高压患者的长期预后和治疗反应的数据有限。检索了PubMed和Embase,以查找2001年1月至2018年1月期间发表的关于肺动脉高压患者的观察性登记研究和随机对照试验的出版物。符合条件的登记研究纳入了年龄≥18岁、>30岁的肺动脉高压患者,并按功能分级报告生存率。随机对照试验的纳入标准为年龄≥18岁、治疗时间≥6个月,以及以功能分级报告的发病率、死亡率或病情恶化时间作为终点。主要结局为登记研究的生存率和随机对照试验的临床事件发生率。分别为登记研究和随机对照试验计算了单独的随机效应模型。纳入了四项随机对照试验(n = 2482)和十项登记研究(n = 6580)。登记研究纳入了9%-47%的功能分级为I/II级的患者(绝大多数为功能分级II级),病因各异。功能分级为I/II级的患者在1年、2年和3年时的生存率分别为93%(95%置信区间(CI):91%-95%)、86%(95%CI:82%-89%)和78%(95%CI:73%-83%)。随机对照试验总体治疗效果的风险比为0.61(95%CI:0.51-0.74),功能分级为I/II级的患者为0.60(95%CI:0.44-0.82),功能分级为III/IV级的患者为0.62(95%CI:0.49-0.78)。功能分级为I/II级的患者三年内计算出的死亡风险为22%,这突出表明需要对功能分级为I/II级疾病的患者进行仔细评估和优化治疗。随机对照试验分析表明,目前的药物治疗对该人群有有益的治疗效果。