Zdroik Jennifer, Veliz Philip
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Dec;13(12):1317-1324. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0099. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
School districts in the United States are turning toward new sources of revenue to maintain their interscholastic sports programs. One common revenue generating policy is the implementation of participation fees, also known as pay-to-play. One concern of the growing trend of participation fees is how it impacts student participation opportunities. This study looks at how pay-to-play fees are impacting participation opportunities and participation rates in the state of Michigan.
Through merging 3 school-level data sets, Civil Rights Data Collection, the Common Core of Data, and participation information from MHSAA (Michigan High School Athletic Association), bivariate analysis and ordinary least squares regression were used in our analysis.
Our findings indicate that certain types of schools are able to support pay-to-play fees: relatively large schools that are located in suburban, white communities, with relatively low poverty rates. We also found that participation fees are not decreasing the number of sport opportunities for students, participation opportunities are higher in schools with fees; but participation rates are similar between schools with and without participation fees.
Participation fee policy implications are discussed and we offer suggestions for future research.
美国各学区正在转向新的收入来源以维持其校际体育项目。一项常见的创收政策是实施参与费,也称为“付费参赛”。参与费不断增长的趋势引发的一个担忧是它如何影响学生的参与机会。本研究考察了“付费参赛”费用如何影响密歇根州的参与机会和参与率。
通过合并三个学校层面的数据集,即民权数据收集、核心数据以及来自密歇根高中体育协会(MHSAA)的参与信息,我们在分析中使用了双变量分析和普通最小二乘法回归。
我们的研究结果表明,某些类型的学校能够支持“付费参赛”费用:位于郊区白人社区、贫困率相对较低的规模较大的学校。我们还发现,参与费并没有减少学生的体育机会数量,有费用的学校参与机会更高;但有参与费和没有参与费的学校之间参与率相似。
讨论了参与费政策的影响,并为未来研究提供了建议。