Bountress Kaitlin, Adams Zachary W, Gilmore Amanda K, Amstadter Ananda B, Thomas Suzanne, Danielson Carla K
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
Young adult alcohol misuse is associated with numerous long-term adverse outcomes. Given the link between impulsivity and alcohol use, we examined whether three impulsivity-related traits differentially predicted number of drinks per drinking day (DDD). We also examined whether these effects varied for those with different trauma histories.
The current study (n=254) examined motor, non-planning, and attentional impulsivity as predictors of DDD. It also examined whether impulsivity was differentially predictive of DDD across individuals in: a control group (non-trauma exposed), a trauma exposed but non-PTSD group, and a PTSD group.
Regardless of group, more motor impulsivity was associated with more DDD. The effect of non-planning impulsivity varied according to trauma history. Specifically, more non-planning impulsivity predicted more DDD for those without PTSD. Finally, attentional impulsivity was not predictive of DDD.
Young adults with high levels of motor impulsivity, regardless of trauma history, may be a particularly high-risk group in terms of propensity for alcohol use/misuse. Additionally, high levels of non-planning impulsivity may signify those at greater risk for alcohol misuse, among those without PTSD. Motor impulsivity and non-planning impulsivity may serve as useful intervention targets in alcohol misuse prevention efforts. Implications for future research in this area are discussed.
青年期酒精滥用与众多长期不良后果相关。鉴于冲动性与酒精使用之间的联系,我们研究了三种与冲动性相关的特质是否能不同程度地预测每日饮酒量(DDD)。我们还研究了这些影响在有不同创伤史的人群中是否存在差异。
本研究(n = 254)考察了运动冲动性、非计划性冲动性和注意力冲动性作为DDD的预测因素。它还考察了冲动性在以下几组人群中对DDD的预测是否存在差异:对照组(未暴露于创伤)、暴露于创伤但未患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)组和PTSD组。
无论在哪一组中,运动冲动性越强,DDD越高。非计划性冲动性的影响因创伤史而异。具体而言,对于未患PTSD的人,非计划性冲动性越强,DDD越高。最后,注意力冲动性不能预测DDD。
无论创伤史如何,运动冲动性水平高的青年在酒精使用/滥用倾向方面可能是特别高风险的群体。此外,在未患PTSD的人群中,高水平的非计划性冲动性可能意味着酒精滥用风险更高。运动冲动性和非计划性冲动性可能是酒精滥用预防工作中有用的干预目标。本文讨论了该领域未来研究的意义。