• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修手术期间未感染阴茎假体的培养物;抗生素涂层与未涂层装置的比较

Non-infected penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery; comparison between antibiotic coated and non - coated devices.

作者信息

Ciftci Seyfettin, Nemut Tijen, Culha Mustafa Melih, Yilmaz Hasan, Ustuner Murat, Yavuz Ufuk, Ozkan Levend, Karadenizli Aynur, Turkan Sadi

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Kocaeli Medical Faculty, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Department of Health School, University of Sakarya, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1183-1189. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0061.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0061
PMID:27622281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5117975/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Aim of this study is to investigate bacterial growth on non-infected devices and compare antibiotic-coated and non-coated implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of 71 patients who underwent revision surgeries for penile prosthesis between 1995 and 2013 were reviewed. Of those, 31 devices were antibiotic-coated prostheses, while 40 of the implants were non-coated. Swab cultures were routinely obtained from corporal, pump or reservoir site during the operation. If a bacterial biofilm was determined on the prosthesis, it was also cultured.

RESULTS

A total of 5 different organisms were cultured from 18 patients. Of them, 4 devices were antibiotic-coated and the other 14 were non-coated devices. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common organism, while Staphylococcus hominis, beta hemolitic streptococcus, Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis were also cultured. All patients who had positive cultures were treated with appropriate antibiotics for four weeks postoperatively. Median follow-up time was 41 months, ranging between 8 and 82 months. One prosthesis (non-coated) became clinically infected in the follow-up period with a totally different organism. Culture positivity rates of antibiotic-coated and non-coated devices were 13% and 35% respectively and the result was significant (p=0.00254).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive bacterial cultures are present on non-infected penile prostheses at revision surgeries in some of the patients. Antibiotic coated prostheses have much less positive cultures than non-coated devices.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在调查未感染器械上的细菌生长情况,并比较抗生素涂层和非涂层植入物。

材料与方法

回顾了1995年至2013年间接受阴茎假体翻修手术的71例患者的病历。其中,31个器械为抗生素涂层假体,40个植入物为非涂层。术中常规从阴茎海绵体、泵或储液器部位获取拭子培养物。如果在假体上检测到细菌生物膜,也进行培养。

结果

共从18例患者中培养出5种不同的微生物。其中,4个器械为抗生素涂层,另外14个为非涂层器械。表皮葡萄球菌是最常见的微生物,同时还培养出了人葡萄球菌、β溶血性链球菌、大肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌。所有培养结果为阳性的患者术后均接受了四周的适当抗生素治疗。中位随访时间为41个月,范围在8至82个月之间。在随访期间,一个假体(非涂层)因完全不同的微生物发生了临床感染。抗生素涂层和非涂层器械的培养阳性率分别为13%和35%,结果具有显著性(p=0.00254)。

结论

在一些患者的翻修手术中,未感染的阴茎假体上存在细菌培养阳性情况。抗生素涂层假体的培养阳性率远低于非涂层器械。

相似文献

1
Non-infected penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery; comparison between antibiotic coated and non - coated devices.翻修手术期间未感染阴茎假体的培养物;抗生素涂层与未涂层装置的比较
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1183-1189. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0061.
2
Antibiotic coating reduces penile prosthesis infection.抗生素涂层可降低阴茎假体感染率。
J Sex Med. 2005 Jul;2(4):565-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00073.x.
3
Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.阴茎假体翻修手术中的培养物:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):153-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132141.48587.f1.
4
Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection.再次手术时泌尿生殖假体的培养物:质疑表皮葡萄球菌在假体周围感染中的作用。
J Urol. 1995 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):387-90.
5
Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.原创抗生素浸渍可膨胀阴茎假体植入后的长期感染结局:长达 7.7 年的随访。
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):614-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.094. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
6
Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study.翻修冲洗可降低植入物包膜组织培养阳性率:一项多中心研究。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):186-90; discussion 190. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.168. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure.因机械故障更换抗生素涂层阴茎假体时的感染风险。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.010.
8
Infection reduction using antibiotic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis.使用抗生素涂层可充气阴茎假体减少感染
Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.058.
9
Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis.阴茎假体感染相关微生物的多中心调查:对美国泌尿外科学会(AUA)和欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)阴茎假体预防指南疗效的分析
J Sex Med. 2017 Mar;14(3):455-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
Biofilm and Infectious Agents Present at the Time of Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery: Times Are a Changing.在阴茎假体修复手术时出现的生物膜和感染因子:时代在变化。
Sex Med Rev. 2017 Apr;5(2):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of penile implant biofilms-what do we know and what remains unknown?阴茎植入物生物膜的范围综述——我们知道什么以及仍未知什么?
Transl Androl Urol. 2022 Aug;11(8):1210-1221. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-195.
2
Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game.阴茎植入物感染预防第二部分:器械涂层改变了游戏规则。
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Dec;33(8):801-807. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0338-1. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
A Surgeon's Guide to the Various Antibiotic Dips Available During Penile Prosthesis Implantation.阴茎假体植入术中可用的各种抗生素浸液的外科医生指南。
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jan 30;20(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0874-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Significance of biofilm for the prosthetic surgeon.生物膜对假体外科医生的意义。
Curr Urol Rep. 2014 Jun;15(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11934-014-0411-8.
2
Infection retardant coated inflatable penile prostheses decrease the incidence of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗感染涂层可膨胀阴茎假体可降低感染发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
3
Long-term infection outcomes of 3-piece antibiotic impregnated penile prostheses used in replacement implant surgery.3 件式抗生素浸渍阴茎假体在更换植入手术中的长期感染结局。
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):899-903. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.116. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
4
Penile prosthesis infection: approaches to prevention and treatment.阴茎假体感染:预防和治疗方法。
Urol Clin North Am. 2011 May;38(2):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.02.007.
5
Contemporary revision penile prosthesis surgery is not associated with a high risk of implant colonization or infection: a single-surgeon series.当代阴茎假体手术的修正与植入物定植或感染的高风险无关:单外科医生系列研究。
J Sex Med. 2011 May;8(5):1540-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02222.x. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
6
Long-term infection rates in diabetic patients implanted with antibiotic-impregnated versus nonimpregnated inflatable penile prostheses: 7-year outcomes.糖尿病患者植入抗生素浸渍与非浸渍可膨胀 penile 假体的长期感染率:7 年结果。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jul;60(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.046. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
7
Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.原创抗生素浸渍可膨胀阴茎假体植入后的长期感染结局:长达 7.7 年的随访。
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):614-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.094. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
8
Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction.勃起功能障碍的植入物、机械装置和血管外科手术。
J Sex Med. 2010 Jan;7(1 Pt 2):501-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01626.x.
9
Infection reduction using antibiotic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis.使用抗生素涂层可充气阴茎假体减少感染
Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.058.
10
Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure.因机械故障更换抗生素涂层阴茎假体时的感染风险。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.010.