Suppr超能文献

关于使用热成像评估烧伤创面愈合潜力的见解:与激光多普勒成像相比,这是一种可靠且有效的技术。

Insights into the use of thermography to assess burn wound healing potential: a reliable and valid technique when compared to laser Doppler imaging.

作者信息

Jaspers Mariëlle E H, Maltha Ilse, Klaessens John H G M, de Vet Henrica C W, Verdaasdonk Rudolf M, van Zuijlen Paul P M

机构信息

Burn Center, Red Cross Hospital, P.O. Box 1074, 1940 EB Beverwijk, The NetherlandsbAssociation of Dutch Burn Centers, P.O. Box 1015, 1940 EA Beverwijk, The NetherlandscRed Cross Hospital, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, P.O. Box 1074, 1940 EB Beverwijk, The NetherlandsdVU Medical Center, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The NetherlandseResearch Institute MOVE VU University Medical Center of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Burn Center, Red Cross Hospital, P.O. Box 1074, 1940 EB Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Biomed Opt. 2016 Sep 1;21(9):96006. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.096006.

Abstract

Adequate assessment of burn wounds is crucial in the management of burn patients. Thermography, as a noninvasive measurement tool, can be utilized to detect the remaining perfusion over large burn wound areas by measuring temperature, thereby reflecting the healing potential (HP) (i.e., number of days that burns require to heal). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinimetric properties (i.e., reliability and validity) of thermography for measuring burn wound HP. To evaluate reliability, two independent observers performed a thermography measurement of 50 burns. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated. To assess validity, temperature differences between burned and nonburned skin (?T) were compared to the HP found by laser Doppler imaging (serving as the reference standard). By applying a visual method, one ?T cutoff point was identified to differentiate between burns requiring conservative versus surgical treatment. The ICC was 0.99, expressing an excellent correlation between two measurements. The SEM was calculated at 0.22°C, the LoA at ?0.58°C and 0.64°C. The ?T cutoff point was ?0.07°C (sensitivity 80%; specificity 80%). These results show that thermography is a reliable and valid technique in the assessment of burn wound HP.

摘要

对烧伤创面进行充分评估对于烧伤患者的治疗至关重要。热成像作为一种非侵入性测量工具,可通过测量温度来检测大面积烧伤创面区域的剩余灌注情况,从而反映愈合潜力(HP)(即烧伤愈合所需的天数)。本研究的目的是评估热成像测量烧伤创面HP的临床测量特性(即可靠性和有效性)。为评估可靠性,两名独立观察者对50处烧伤进行了热成像测量。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和一致性界限(LoA)。为评估有效性,将烧伤皮肤与未烧伤皮肤之间的温度差(?T)与激光多普勒成像所确定的HP(作为参考标准)进行了比较。通过应用一种视觉方法,确定了一个?T临界值,以区分需要保守治疗与手术治疗的烧伤。ICC为0.99,表明两次测量之间具有极好的相关性。计算得出SEM为0.22°C,LoA为?0.58°C和0.64°C。?T临界值为?0.07°C(敏感性80%;特异性80%)。这些结果表明,热成像在评估烧伤创面HP方面是一种可靠且有效的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验