Gerber David E, Reimer Torsten, Williams Erin L, Gill Mary, Loudat Priddy Laurin, Bergestuen Deidi, Schiller Joan H, Kirkpatrick Haskell, Craddock Lee Simon J
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Nov;12(11):1020-1028. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013060. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
This article describes the care processes for a 64-year-old man with newly diagnosed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who was enrolled in a first-line clinical trial of a new immunotherapy regimen. The case highlights the concept of multiteam systems in cancer clinical research and clinical care. Because clinical research represents a highly dynamic entity-with studies frequently opening, closing, and undergoing modifications-concerted efforts of multiple teams are needed to respond to these changes while continuing to provide consistent, high-level care and timely, accurate clinical data. The case illustrates typical challenges of multiteam care processes. Compared with clinical tasks that are routinely performed by single teams, multiple-team care greatly increases the demands for communication, collaboration, cohesion, and coordination among team members. As the case illustrates, the described research team and clinical team are separated, resulting in suboptimal function. Individual team members interact predominantly with members of their own team. A considerable number of team members lack regular interaction with anyone outside their team. Accompanying this separation, the teams enact rivalries that impede collaboration. The teams have misaligned goals and competing priorities that create competition. Collective identity and cohesion across the two teams are low. Research team and clinical team members have limited knowledge of the roles and work of individuals outside their team. Recommendations to increase trust and collaboration are provided. Clinical providers and researchers may incorporate these themes into development and evaluation of multiteam systems, multidisciplinary teams, and cross-functional teams within their own institutions.
本文描述了一名64岁新诊断为晚期非小细胞肺癌男性患者的护理过程,该患者参加了一项新免疫治疗方案的一线临床试验。该病例突出了癌症临床研究和临床护理中多团队系统的概念。由于临床研究是一个高度动态的实体——研究经常启动、结束并进行修改——因此需要多个团队共同努力,以应对这些变化,同时继续提供一致、高水平的护理以及及时、准确的临床数据。该病例说明了多团队护理过程中的典型挑战。与单个团队常规执行的临床任务相比,多团队护理大大增加了对团队成员之间沟通、协作、凝聚力和协调的要求。正如该病例所示,所描述的研究团队和临床团队是分开的,导致功能欠佳。团队成员主要与自己团队的成员互动。相当多的团队成员与团队之外的任何人缺乏定期互动。伴随着这种分离,两个团队产生了阻碍协作的竞争关系。团队目标不一致且优先事项相互冲突,从而引发了竞争。两个团队之间的集体认同感和凝聚力较低。研究团队和临床团队成员对团队之外人员的角色和工作了解有限。本文提供了增强信任和协作的建议。临床医疗人员和研究人员可将这些主题纳入其所在机构内多团队系统、多学科团队和跨职能团队的开发与评估中。