Carter Dorothy R, Cullen-Lester Kristin L, Jones Justin M, Gerbasi Alexandra, Chrobot-Mason Donna, Nae Eun Young
Department of Psychology, The University of Georgia, 125 Baldwin Street, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
Department of Management & Leadership, Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, 4750 Calhoun Rd, Houston, Texas 77004, USA.
Leadersh Q. 2020 Feb;31(1). doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101378. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
Research on team leadership has primarily focused on leadership processes targeted within teams, in support of team objectives. Yet, teams are open systems that interact with other teams to achieve proximal as well as distal goals. This review clarifies that defining '' constitutes functionally effective leadership in interteam contexts requires greater precision with regard to (within teams, across teams) and (team goals, system goals) leadership processes are enacted, as well as greater consideration of and leadership processes arise. We begin by synthesizing findings from empirical studies published over the past 30 years that shed light on questions of what, where, why, when, and who related to interteam leadership and end by providing three overarching recommendations for how research should proceed in order to provide a more comprehensive picture of leadership in interteam contexts.
团队领导力研究主要聚焦于团队内部为支持团队目标而开展的领导过程。然而，团队是开放系统，会与其他团队互动以实现近期和远期目标。本综述阐明，要明确在团队间情境中构成功能有效领导力的因素，就需要在领导过程的实施范围（团队内部、跨团队）和目标（团队目标、系统目标）方面更加精确，同时要更多地考虑领导过程产生的背景和方式。我们首先综合过去30年发表的实证研究结果，这些研究揭示了与团队间领导力相关的是什么、在哪里、为什么、何时以及谁等问题，最后就研究应如何推进提出三项总体建议，以便更全面地描绘团队间情境中的领导力。
