Takahashi Hironori, Ohkuchi Akihide, Usui Rie, Suzuki Hirotada, Baba Yosuke, Matsubara Shigeki
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan.
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2016;2016:5349063. doi: 10.1155/2016/5349063. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Introduction. To identify factors that determine blood loss during peripartum hysterectomy for abnormally invasive placenta (AIP-hysterectomy). Methods. We reviewed all of the medical charts of 11,919 deliveries in a single tertiary perinatal center. We examined characteristics of AIP-hysterectomy patients, with a single experienced obstetrician attending all AIP-hysterectomies and using the same technique. Results. AIP-hysterectomy was performed in 18 patients (0.15%: 18/11,919). Of the 18, 14 (78%) had a prior cesarean section (CS) history and the other 4 (22%) were primiparous women. Planned AIP-hysterectomy was performed in 12/18 (67%), with the remaining 6 (33%) undergoing emergent AIP-hysterectomy. Of the 6, 4 (4/6: 67%) patients were primiparous women. An intra-arterial balloon was inserted in 9/18 (50%). Women with the following three factors significantly bled less in AIP-hysterectomy than its counterpart: the employment of an intra-arterial balloon (4,448 ± 1,948 versus 8,861 ± 3,988 mL), planned hysterectomy (5,003 ± 2,057 versus 9,957 ± 4,485 mL), and prior CS (5,706 ± 2,727 versus 9,975 ± 5,532 mL). Patients with prior CS (-) bled more: this may be because these patients tended to undergo emergent surgery or attempted placental separation. Conclusion. Patients with intra-arterial balloon catheter insertion bled less on AIP-hysterectomy. Massive bleeding occurred in emergent AIP-hysterectomy without prior CS.
引言。确定导致异常侵入性胎盘围产期子宫切除术(AIP子宫切除术)期间失血的因素。方法。我们回顾了一家三级围产期中心11919例分娩的所有病历。我们检查了AIP子宫切除术患者的特征,所有AIP子宫切除术均由一位经验丰富的产科医生进行,并采用相同的技术。结果。18例患者(0.15%:18/11919)接受了AIP子宫切除术。在这18例患者中,14例(78%)有剖宫产史,另外4例(22%)为初产妇。12/18(67%)例患者进行了计划性AIP子宫切除术,其余6例(33%)接受了急诊AIP子宫切除术。在这6例患者中,4例(4/6:67%)为初产妇。9/18(50%)例患者插入了动脉内球囊。具有以下三个因素的女性在AIP子宫切除术中的出血量明显少于对照组:使用动脉内球囊(4448±1948 vs 8861±3988 mL)、计划性子宫切除术(5003±2057 vs 9957±4485 mL)和既往剖宫产史(5706±2727 vs 9975±5532 mL)。既往无剖宫产史(-)的患者出血更多:这可能是因为这些患者倾向于接受急诊手术或尝试胎盘剥离。结论。插入动脉内球囊导管的患者在AIP子宫切除术中出血较少。在无既往剖宫产史的急诊AIP子宫切除术中发生了大量出血。